Mike Harris wrote:
IMHO it would be more useful if bicycle=no meant 'no cycling' ... I think
there are quite a few situations where a cyclist could wheel (or carry) the
bike but not ride it. Without bicycle=no it would be difficult to know that
it was 'no cycling' but with 'bicycle=no' +
Chris Hill wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
I'd tag a section marked as cyclists must dismount as a footway,
bicycle=destination (since there's no way in hell you'd want to take a
route that bogus as anything but a last resort).
Except that in Hull, UK two of the National Cycle Network routes (1
