Re: [Tagging] Green areas that are not parks (revisited)
Roy Wallace napsal(a): 2010/5/10 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com Until there is a better solution I'll use the proposed scheme of landuse='residential' + residential='garden'. FWIW, I don't like that. Look at residential=garden...someone lives in the garden? Well, yes :) You don't need to sleep there over night (although especially kids do that sometimes) to designate it as a residential area. Petr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Green areas that are not parks (revisited)
Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote: But after a while of searching the wiki, I found something reasonable... Until there is a better solution I'll use the proposed scheme of landuse='residential' + residential='garden'. Landuses are a relatively large-scale, abstract classification. A typical residential landuse area contains many buildings, gardens and other associated features. So gardens can certainly be a part of a residential area, but they aren't residential areas themselves. Tobias Knerr ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
