Re: [Tagging] Jewellery shop

2010-07-03 Thread Niklas Cholmkvist
Hi, I have seen http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=jewelry Undoubtedly the spelling is not acceptable in en_IN On wiktionary there is info that jewellery is a chiefly US spelling. source: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/en/wiki/jewelry Regards, Niklas -- signature.asc

Re: [Tagging] Jewellery shop

2010-07-03 Thread Chris Hill
Niklas Cholmkvist wrote: Hi, I have seen http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=jewelry Undoubtedly the spelling is not acceptable in en_IN On wiktionary there is info that jewellery is a chiefly US spelling. source: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/en/wiki/jewelry I

Re: [Tagging] Jewellery shop

2010-07-03 Thread John F. Eldredge
Jewelry is the usual spelling in the USA, although I have occasionally seen the two-L spelling. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all. -- Hypatia of Alexandria -Original Message- From: Chris

Re: [Tagging] Billboards and other kinds of advert

2010-07-03 Thread John F. Eldredge
On the other hand, perhaps we should have a tag for sign, with billboard as a sub-type? After all, there are additional types of signs that we might want to tag as landmarks. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not

Re: [Tagging] Billboards and other kinds of advert

2010-07-03 Thread Tobias Knerr
y...@o2.pl wrote: I was searching for a tag for billboard and I don't see any tag for advert. That's something I already wanted to map myself, so I would like to see a set of tags defined for it. amenity=advert (or rather information=advert?) The information key is currently only defined as

Re: [Tagging] Billboards and other kinds of advert

2010-07-03 Thread y...@o2.pl
2010/7/3 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de: The information key is currently only defined as a subkey for tourism=information, so I'd rather not use it. Amenities tend to be something you might actively look for. How about using man_made instead? Sounds good. Isn't that simply a