Hi all
Voting on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/default_layer_for_bridge_and_tunnelwas
been started on 11.01.2011.
I was sent messages to this mailling list 15.12.2010 about start RFC and
11.01.2011 about start voting. Messages had to go through after being
moderated because
Canabis wrote:
I didn't recieved notification of block of messages. I relied
on the phrase in the auto answer: Either the message will
get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the
moderator's decision.
Unfortunately the amount of spam postings and cross-postings from
Canabis wrote:
* I didn't recieved notification of block of messages. I relied
** on the phrase in the auto answer: Either the message will
** get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the
** moderator's decision.
*
Unfortunately the amount of spam postings and
Hi,
Thanks Robert for your corrections and comments :)
personnaly i think that multiple value are harder to read, to compute
and to search it's the reason why i chose this...
now that you tell me this i'm bit confused not sure which one to choose...
what others are thinking?
Thanks for your
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The question is, what else would go there? Flood gates don't belong there -
that's the *usage* of the gate, not the *type* of gate.
From a technical perspective you may be right, but practically
speaking, we should design
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The question is, what else would go there? Flood gates don't belong there -
that's the *usage* of the gate, not the *type* of gate.
From a technical
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The question is, what else would go there? Flood gates don't belong
there - that's the *usage* of the gate, not the *type* of gate.
From a technical perspective you may be right, but practically speaking,
we should design
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand, what if one knows that there's a gate but not its
purpose (for instance, when mapping drainage canals through swampy
areas)?
Indeed. How to cater for both situations?
Steve
On 18 January 2011 09:18, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
waterway=flood_gate
flood_gate=sluice_gate
...is more usable for non-techie nerds than something like:
waterway=flow_control
flow_control=sluice_gate
usage=flood_gate
So why do we use highway=* for even small tracks?
-1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:19 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
So why do we use highway=* for even small tracks?
The tagging system as a whole will never be entirely consistent, or
even operate on consistent principles. The best we can do is fix small
chunks at a time, and make
On 18 January 2011 16:13, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:19 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
So why do we use highway=* for even small tracks?
The tagging system as a whole will never be entirely consistent, or
even operate on consistent
11 matches
Mail list logo
