[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - default layer value for bridge and tunnel
Hi all Voting on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/default_layer_for_bridge_and_tunnelwas been started on 11.01.2011. I was sent messages to this mailling list 15.12.2010 about start RFC and 11.01.2011 about start voting. Messages had to go through after being moderated because I am not a member of the mailing list. I didn't recieved notification of block of messages. I relied on the phrase in the auto answer: Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. Please voting at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/default_layer_for_bridge_and_tunnel#Votinghttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/default_layer_for_bridge_and_tunnel Best Regards, canabis ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - default layer value for bridge and tunnel
Canabis wrote: I didn't recieved notification of block of messages. I relied on the phrase in the auto answer: Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. Unfortunately the amount of spam postings and cross-postings from non-subscribers is such that it isn't practical to filter messages one-by-one. If you want to post to the list, as with any OSM mailing list, you need to subscribe. Richard (tagging@ moderator) -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-default-layer-value-for-bridge-and-tunnel-tp5931342p5931399.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - Voting - default layer value for bridge and tunnel
Canabis wrote: * I didn't recieved notification of block of messages. I relied ** on the phrase in the auto answer: Either the message will ** get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the ** moderator's decision. * Unfortunately the amount of spam postings and cross-postings from non-subscribers is such that it isn't practical to filter messages one-by-one. If you want to post to the list, as with any OSM mailing list, you need to subscribe. Richard (tagging@ moderator) Maybe put this information into auto answer text!? -- canabis ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Scuba diving (Shop or spot)
Hi, Thanks Robert for your corrections and comments :) personnaly i think that multiple value are harder to read, to compute and to search it's the reason why i chose this... now that you tell me this i'm bit confused not sure which one to choose... what others are thinking? Thanks for your feedback eMerzh On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 19:46, Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info wrote: I have corrected some typo's last week I was pleased you used namespaces. That good. I want to make a suggestion to configure this a little different. * scuba_diving:filling=air;nitrox32;nitrox36;trimix;oxygen In that way to are prepared to future developments and also you don't have to create extra sub tags. Also like this: * scuba_diving:services=repair;cources I hope you can use it. -Robert-z -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: eMerzh Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 8:37 PM To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Scuba diving (Shop or spot) Hi everybody, I'm a scuba diver and when i goes somewhere to dive, i map the place in osm. Previously, i've checked the wiki and saw the tag sport=diving [1], so i use it. But later, i discovered the other, but still in proposed state, tag : sport=scuba_diving [2]. When i compare the tags for sport=diving [3] and sport=scuba_diving [4], scuba_diving is far more used (~59 vs ~2200) I've also discovered another tagging schem/guide for scuba in Switzerland [5] But it seems that we haven't anything official and spread...( sport=scuba_diving is stuck in the process and look a bit messy) So i've made another proposition : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/scuba_diving2 It basically take ideas from the differents schemes, trying to reuse existing tags and use what's currently in the db. If the process is accepted i'll try to reach creators of sport=diving to propose to change theres features to the new scheme Please add your comments here or on the talk page if you have one... Thanks eMerzh [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Ddiving [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/scuba_diving [3] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/?key=sportvalue=diving [4] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/?key=sportvalue=scuba_diving [5] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Switzerland/DiveSpots ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging --- Tekst ingevoegd door Panda GP 2011: Als het hier gaat om een ongevraagde e-mail (SPAM), klik dan op de volgende link om de e-mail te herclasseren: http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_1936SPAM=truepath=C:\Windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Global%20Protection%202011\AntiSpam --- ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: The question is, what else would go there? Flood gates don't belong there - that's the *usage* of the gate, not the *type* of gate. From a technical perspective you may be right, but practically speaking, we should design tagging schemes with usability in mind. People are likely to know that there is a flood gate, not that there is a hinged crest gate. So something like: waterway=flood_gate flood_gate=sluice_gate ...is more usable for non-techie nerds than something like: waterway=flow_control flow_control=sluice_gate usage=flood_gate Steve ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: The question is, what else would go there? Flood gates don't belong there - that's the *usage* of the gate, not the *type* of gate. From a technical perspective you may be right, but practically speaking, we should design tagging schemes with usability in mind. People are likely to know that there is a flood gate, not that there is a hinged crest gate. On the other hand, what if one knows that there's a gate but not its purpose (for instance, when mapping drainage canals through swampy areas)? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: The question is, what else would go there? Flood gates don't belong there - that's the *usage* of the gate, not the *type* of gate. From a technical perspective you may be right, but practically speaking, we should design tagging schemes with usability in mind. People are likely to know that there is a flood gate, not that there is a hinged crest gate. So something like: waterway=flood_gate flood_gate=sluice_gate ...is more usable for non-techie nerds than something like: waterway=flow_control flow_control=sluice_gate usage=flood_gate Most of the sluice gates around here are not flood gates. For some of the ones I've mapped I'm not sure if they're flood gates or not, but I know they're sluice gates because that is obvious from a quick look while to say if they're flood gates or not I would need to know how they're being used, when they're opened, etc ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: On the other hand, what if one knows that there's a gate but not its purpose (for instance, when mapping drainage canals through swampy areas)? Indeed. How to cater for both situations? Steve ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate
On 18 January 2011 09:18, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: waterway=flood_gate flood_gate=sluice_gate ...is more usable for non-techie nerds than something like: waterway=flow_control flow_control=sluice_gate usage=flood_gate So why do we use highway=* for even small tracks? -1 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:19 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: So why do we use highway=* for even small tracks? The tagging system as a whole will never be entirely consistent, or even operate on consistent principles. The best we can do is fix small chunks at a time, and make those chunks as big as is practical. Therefore, let's not avoid fixing X just because it doesn't fix Y as well. Steve ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate
On 18 January 2011 16:13, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:19 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: So why do we use highway=* for even small tracks? The tagging system as a whole will never be entirely consistent, or even operate on consistent principles. The best we can do is fix small chunks at a time, and make those chunks as big as is practical. Therefore, let's not avoid fixing X just because it doesn't fix Y as well. Exactly, so why should we use flood when at least half or more of these things have nothing to do with flooding? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
