Hi.
At some point we've been fed up with fixing name=Pond and such, so I guess
it's time to be more specific about what natural=water is. I suggest a new
detail tag, water=*. It's pretty straightforward, but there are some
deprecations (which at this point can't deprecate anything because there
a
I've been working on a draft to deal with this question.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional
I haven't moved it to RFC yet since I want to polish it a bit more, but a
couple of things to note.
- Currently every waterway is equivalent to directional=yes. If it's been
Nathan Edgars II:
> I'm wondering if there would be any support for a
> flow=forward/backward/etc. tag for waterways. This would make the flow
> direction explicit, and would provide a machine-readable way to tag
> unknown or abnormal flow.
"I will explicitly tag implied information to reduce the
On 3/31/2011 1:25 PM, Sam Vekemans wrote:
On 3/31/11, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I'm wondering if there would be any support for a
flow=forward/backward/etc. tag for waterways. This would make the flow
direction explicit, and would provide a machine-readable way to tag
unknown or abnormal flow.
N
On 31-3-2011 19:25, Sam Vekemans wrote:
Nope it's actually just a rendering rule that can be created.
Technically, yes. That would also be the wrong approach.
If the direction of the way is drawn in the same flow of the water, it
should always be drawn with an arrow.
What if it's drawn
Hi,
Nope it's actually just a rendering rule that can be created.
If the direction of the way is drawn in the same flow of the water, it
should always be drawn with an arrow.
this rendering rule could be immediatly applied on mapnik, then you
would see water pointing everywhere ... this ju
I'm wondering if there would be any support for a
flow=forward/backward/etc. tag for waterways. This would make the flow
direction explicit, and would provide a machine-readable way to tag
unknown or abnormal flow.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@op
Hi Dave
There are (hopefully enough) examples in the proposal.
Cheers
Teddy
On 31.03.2011 13:01, Dave F. wrote:
On 31/03/2011 09:41, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
Hi
Voting is open for public transport proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
Hi Tedd
On 31/03/2011 09:41, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
Voting is open for public transport proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
This may be a silly question, but...
From a mkgmap perspective, I can search for "public_transport=platform"
and treat it as "
On 29/03/2011 20:40, ael wrote:
Works fine in firefox here: a cache problem, perhaps?
And finally it appears!
The proposal looks good, but I'm not sure that shop:* is needed.
As these tags are subsets of shop=bicycle, bicycle:repair, for example,
would suffice.
It saves a bit of typing.
On 31/03/2011 09:41, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
Hi
Voting is open for public transport proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
Hi Teddy
Do you have an example of a stop_area that we can look at?
Cheers
Dave F.
__
Hi
Voting is open for public transport proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
Regards
Teddy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
12 matches
Mail list logo