Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:41 AM, SomeoneElse The stats are crocked due to seav (who appears to be running a bot without checking with local mappers first) changing them.  The last wiki edits were by seav editing the page to match the version that they favoured.  The tagging@ discussion that

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread SomeoneElse
On 29/06/2011 13:22, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: I don't run any bots. I used JXAPI and JOSM. That's irrelevant; you're still changing data across the planet. Data consumers still need to know if the data is changing beneath their feet, though. Your last post on the tagging list:

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Mike N
On 6/29/2011 8:46 AM, SomeoneElse wrote: That's irrelevant; you're still changing data across the planet. I don't see these edits as out of line or unusual. It's not so different from the dozens of other projects to create more unified tags so that data consumers have a chance of using

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Jonathan Bennett
On 29/06/2011 14:19, Mike N wrote: I don't see these edits as out of line or unusual. It's not so different from the dozens of other projects to create more unified tags so that data consumers have a chance of using the right tag. I suspect the tags you're talking about in other projects

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Josh Doe
It might be useful to know how many uses of the two variants were present before Eugene (seav) began changing them. My impression is that both were being used commonly, and thus data consumers had to accept both spellings, and so this change isn't such a big deal. Of course it would have been

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Mike N
On 6/29/2011 9:31 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote: On 29/06/2011 14:19, Mike N wrote: I don't see these edits as out of line or unusual. It's not so different from the dozens of other projects to create more unified tags so that data consumers have a chance of using the right tag. I suspect the

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Pieren
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote: I have no ability to say if drive-through or drive_through or drive-thru is the best one but I always thank people trying to keep tagging consistent in the database. For instance, we have currently 879 different 'highway' values

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: Potlatch2 tags drive-through. The wiki some users who changed this tag think it's drive_through. Not that it makes any odds to me which it is, but it might save time for others who go around changing one to the other.

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Nathan Edgars II
You want silly retaggings? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6380219 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Dave F.
On 29/06/2011 14:57, Anthony wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote: Potlatch2 tags drive-through. The wiki some users who changed this tag think it's drive_through. Not that it makes any odds to me which it is, but it might save time for others who go

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: My main irritation about things like this is not if it's X or Y, but that we can't decide whether it's X or Y. It makes the database a jumbled mess that on at least one occasion has caused a potential user of the info to

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread David Murn
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:51 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote: I would not be surprised if there are also some occurrences of drive-thru or drive_thru. American business people seem to prefer to write thru rather than through, so much so that some members of the public probably aren't aware

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/6/29 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au: Well, technically if were mapping whats on the ground, a lot of restaurant signs say Drive thru.  The wiki has a redirect from drive_thru to drive_through, with 4 occurances of 'drive thru' on the page, but no explanation about why the tag uses the

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 6/29/2011 12:40 AM, David Murn wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:51 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote: I would not be surprised if there are also some occurrences of drive-thru or drive_thru. American business people seem to prefer to write thru rather than through, so much so that some

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread Dave F.
On 29/06/2011 05:40, David Murn wrote: While the latter is the more traditional spelling, that doesnt mean that anyone should go around changing 'Dunkin Donuts' to 'Dunkin Doughnuts', if its tagged the first way.. the same way I believe you shouldnt be changing the 'Drive thru' signed areas to

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

2011-06-29 Thread James Mast
All I know is that service=drive-through was rendered already in Mapnik while service=drive_through is not. Look here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.525952lon=-80.006203zoom=18layers=M I had originally tagged the Drive Thru's for Taco Bell and Arby's here as service=drive-through