As the tag for rails is really missing should it be
man_made=crane_rail or man_made=crane with crane:rail=yes
I would prefer the first option or some other tag as the second one
might look like there are 3 separate cranes.
About values of crane:type it seems like spaces need removing and the
2011/8/23 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
You mean like this?
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.meg/wcc/facility-of-the-month/September2007.htm
Yes :D
Similarly exists in other parts of the world as well:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Radeln_oder_doch_nicht.JPG
The whole
On 8/23/2011 6:30 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 8/23/2011 6:05 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
If a sidewalk is mapped as a separate way, what's the appropriate
sidewalk=* tag for the parallel highway?
Just a guess, that there would be no sidewalk= for the highway,
otherwise the imaginary rendering /
Put the sidewalk tag on the road, and put some indicator on the
footway (I use adjacent=yes) that it's also covered by tagging on the
adjacent way.
The worst that happens is some router gets two parallel links in their
network, or that some super-clever algorithm identifies two parallel
sidewalks
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/67469500 is an extension of a
sidewalk across a railroad, whereas the adjacent highway does not cross.
Is it incorrect to use footway=sidewalk here?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Seems like it needs an operator= tag (e.g. operator=lamar)
In many jurisdictions billboards need a local authority's registration
number, and that number is prominently displayed on the billboard.
Billboards without it are illegal
The proposed example value for the historic key does not seem
reasonable. (nrhp:1231313)
I suggest you have a look how the world heritage proposal suggests to
handle reference numbers:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage
heritage:operator=* see below.
