Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. I don't want to make the whole
layer transparent (I know how to do that), but only the background,
i.e. I only want to see the errors. I thought that this
TRANSPARENT=TRUE will achieve this, but either I applied it wrong or
it simply doesn't work this way.
To give you an advance warning: the updated article is finished and
currently available here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Imagic/Werkstatt
If there are no major objections I will update the lanes article
tomorrow. Minor objections we can further discuss after the update -
otherwise it
Please could someone confirm what Spitsstrook is? It looks like use of the hard
shoulder on managed sections of motorway, but I cannot read dutch.
We have these on the M6 and M42.
Thanks Phil
On 26/04/2012 10:30 Martin Vonwald wrote:
To give you an advance warning: the updated article is
It is an additional lane that will be opened for the general traffic
during rush hours. What I have seen in the Netherlands it is used as
emergency lanes at other times.
Martin
2012/4/26 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
Please could someone confirm what Spitsstrook is? It looks like use of
There are three cases in NL, all referred to as spitsstrook
(literally, rush-hour lane):
1) the hard shoulder is sometimes opened to traffic, creating an extra
lane on the right
2) the left-most lane is sometimes open (if traffic is heavier), and
sometimes closed (if the extra capacity is not
Am 26. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
Can we use the taginfo stats to revert the change made the 2nd may
2010 where phone has been replaced by contact:phone and add a big
deprecate notice on the contact: namespace wiki ? (overall, we
still have 10 times more phone than
Am 26.04.2012 13:07, schrieb Colin Smale:
1) the hard shoulder is sometimes opened to traffic, creating an extra
lane on the right
this case is used in Germany in several regions
e.g.
2012/4/26 Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de:
Shall this lane
- be counted - because it is a managed lane, but that it is only sometimes
- or not - because it is most of the time an emergency lane
Yes, it shall be counted, because it is all the time a managed lane,
that is sometimes open for
Am 26. April 2012 15:37 schrieb Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
2012/4/26 Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de:
Shall this lane
- be counted - because it is a managed lane, but that it is only sometimes
- or not - because it is most of the time an emergency lane
Yes, it shall be
I added a sentence explaining what a managed lane is. Understandable now?
2012/4/26 Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de:
Am 26.04.2012 13:07, schrieb Colin Smale:
1) the hard shoulder is sometimes opened to traffic, creating an extra
lane on the right
this case is used in Germany in
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Where did I mention a renderer? If you draw a closed polygon with
railway=platform, that's a continuous platform with a hole in the middle.
There may be a few cases of such in real life at a complicated junction.
If
On 4/26/2012 8:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Can we use the taginfo stats to revert the change made the 2nd may
2010 where phone has been replaced by contact:phone and add a big
deprecate notice on the contact: namespace wiki ? (overall, we
still have 10 times more phone than
On 26 April 2012 10:30, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com wrote:
To give you an advance warning: the updated article is finished and
currently available here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Imagic/Werkstatt
If there are no major objections I will update the lanes article
Am 26. April 2012 20:03 schrieb Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com:
Major problem: You've haven't adequately dealt with the lanes=1.5 issue.
You've suggested something that can't solve the issue, but simply looks like
an attempt to cleanse it from the lanes tag and forget about it.
Am 26.04.2012 um 20:03 schrieb Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com:
Major problem: You've haven't adequately dealt with the lanes=1.5 issue.
You've suggested something that can't solve the issue, but simply looks like
an attempt to cleanse it from the lanes tag and forget about it.
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 26. April 2012 20:03 schrieb Jason Cunningham
jamicu...@googlemail.com:
Major problem: You've haven't adequately dealt with the lanes=1.5
issue.
You've suggested something that can't solve the issue, but simply
looks like
an attempt
Anthony wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Where did I mention a renderer? If you draw a closed polygon with
railway=platform, that's a continuous platform with a hole in the middle.
There may be a few cases of such in real life at a complicated
17 matches
Mail list logo