Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock
2012/7/2 Martin Vonwald (Imagic) : > Am 02.07.2012 um 22:09 schrieb sabas88 : >> I'd opt for landcover system. > +1 for landcover. IMO the tag natural should not be used for areas (yes, I > know, currently it is used often for areas). I think it is fine to use natural for areas (the very most of over 8 million features tagged with natural=* are actually areas: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/natural ), but I'd like to see it used for topographical features (most of all features that are currently tagged with natural are indeed topographical features, e.g. lakes, bays, woods, springs, beaches, ...) I am opposing the interpretation of "natural" as a class in contrast to "man_made", as it is not a sufficient distinction (too few main classes, hence it leads to exceptions and inconsequencies (everything natural besides x, y and foo, and bar, and z, and w, and t and... which are covered by the keys ...)). cheers, Martin cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Tagging Blue flags (Foundation for Environmental Education's Blue flag criteria for beaches and marinas)
2012/7/2 Johan Jönsson : > I would like to see something more general like award=blue_flag or > award=fee_blue_flag > > where the award-key could be used for all kind of awarded ratings, hotel- > stars, michelin-stars, camping-stars, barcelona-restaurant-forks and so forth -1 I don't see any benefit from a more generic awards or rating key for specific ratings or awards. This will only cause conflicts, lead to multiple values and ambiguity. Btw.: hotel-stars are already covered by "stars" (also too generic IMHO, there is IIRC different hotel rating systems which are not compatible): http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/stars cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock
Am 02.07.2012 um 22:09 schrieb sabas88 : > I'd opt for landcover system. +1 for landcover. IMO the tag natural should not be used for areas (yes, I know, currently it is used often for areas). ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Tagging Blue flags (Foundation for Environmental Education's Blue flag criteria for beaches and marinas)
Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > > 2012/6/27 Janko Mihelić gmail.com>: > > I got an answer about gray flags on their site: > > > >> The grey flags are Blue Flag sites not in Blue Flag season yet: this means > >> they have been awarded the Blue Flag, but will comply with all criteria when > >> their season starts, later in the summer. > > So some beaches are only blue flag compliant during some seasons. I think > > this is too much information for osm right now. fee_blue_flag=yes should be > > enough. > > or tag those fee_blue_flag=grey (or similar)? > > cheers, > Martin > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > I would like to see something more general like award=blue_flag or award=fee_blue_flag where the award-key could be used for all kind of awarded ratings, hotel- stars, michelin-stars, camping-stars, barcelona-restaurant-forks and so forth As the grey flag on the web-site only indicates a blue flag beach out of season, it should be something like: blue_flag:season=May-Oct ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock
2012/7/2 Johan Jönsson > This is an old proposal that have been discussed before. It seem to be in > use > according to tag watch, so I have been urged to make this official. > > There are also similar tags in use and others proposed but that doesn´t > mean > this one could be approved. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bare_rock > > > There are some proposals, it's not a very clear situation (bare_rock, rock, bedrock), no way to tag the typology of the rock.. I tagged bare_rock both with natural and landcover key to be sure... I'd opt for landcover system. Regards, Stefano > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Tagging Blue flags (Foundation for Environmental Education's Blue flag criteria for beaches and marinas)
Simone Saviolo writes: > > Yes, in fact, that's what I meant. Every single beach area in the municipality has been awarded the flag. I am still a bit unsure, though: do you know of cities in which only some of the beaches/marinas have the flag, and others don't? > I Gothenburg, Sweden we had the blue flag on some of our sea baths but not all. I think we abandonded it because of the cost for the tests and so, I think that when a commune decides to apply for the blue flag they will get as many of the baths as possible. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock
This is an old proposal that have been discussed before. It seem to be in use according to tag watch, so I have been urged to make this official. There are also similar tags in use and others proposed but that doesn´t mean this one could be approved. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bare_rock ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
