On 16/06/2013 15:09, fly wrote:
> you still talk about species and later are mentioning "dog/cat/horse"
which are genera.
'dog - A domesticated carnivorous mammal, Canis familiaris (or C. lupus
familiaris)...'
'cat - A well-known carnivorous quadruped ( Felis domesticus) ...'
'horse - A soli
I started a discussion on this on the talk-us list but the best suggestion I've
had, received off list, was to ask here on the tagging list.
My original thread is at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-June/011066.html
Long story: While updating things in the Mt. Pinos area I
Martin and Chris opinions are opposite but both true.
I thought voting could be a chance to put attention on the proposal, but it
seems that few people care about it.
On the other hand that proposal doesn't conflict with other tags, so I could
simply create a wiki page to document it and bypass vot
Felix Delattre writes:
> for the address system based on reference points, which is largely used
> in Central American countries we would like to propose the tag
> "reference_point". This is needed to get routing working in this part of
> the world. We can not use existing tags (such as landmarks)
On 06/16/2013 01:45 PM, Felix Delattre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for the address system based on reference points, which is largely used
> in Central American countries we would like to propose the tag
> "reference_point". This is needed to get routing working in this part of
> the world. We can not use
>@Rob:
>Did you ever try to describe the junction with the Lane and Road
>Attributes?
No, I didn't. And as I've been busy with organising SOTM I didn't even
fully read the tag proposal (hence I didn't vote). I hope you agree that my
general comment about reading through and attempting to address t
Hello,
for the address system based on reference points, which is largely used
in Central American countries we would like to propose the tag
"reference_point". This is needed to get routing working in this part of
the world. We can not use existing tags (such as landmarks) as reference
points can
Am 16.06.2013 13:24, schrieb Chris Hill:
> Alberto wrote:
>
>> Hello, the voting period for this proposal [1] is over: I've already
>> extended the period to have more votes, but at the end we have 10 in
>> favor
>> and 1 against.
>>
>> I've also written to the only person who voted against to d
On 16.06.2013 12:31, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> On 16/giu/2013, at 12:17, "Alberto" > So what’s now? Do you think I should create a definitive wiki page
>> assuming the proposal is approved, although we have only 11 votes in
>> total?
I think you can treat it as approved. The requirement is "has
Voting is pointless and gives tags an air or importance they do not deserve -
there are *no* approved tags, just tags people use. Discussing and documenting
tags is good, but voting is just daft, especially when the quorum is just 15
out of about 15000 regular mappers.
If you like the tag and f
On 16/giu/2013, at 12:17, "Alberto" wrote:
> have more votes, but at the end we have 10 in favor and 1 against.
>
> I’ve also written to the only person who voted against to discuss his
> opinion, but I’ve received no response.
>
> So what’s now? Do you think I should create a definitive w
Hello, the voting period for this proposal [1] is over: I've already
extended the period to have more votes, but at the end we have 10 in favor
and 1 against.
I've also written to the only person who voted against to discuss his
opinion, but I've received no response.
So what's now? Do you think
12 matches
Mail list logo