Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-02 Thread Pieren
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 11:18 PM, François Lacombe francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu wrote: Example : power=pole pole:transformer=yes transformer=distribution voltage=2;400 transformer:ref=XX pole:ref= Move pole:transformer=yes to one of the possible values of transformer

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-02 Thread François Lacombe
Ok, but 'yes' has to be added to the transformer=* table of values in the proposal. It isn't for now, that's why I thought we can't use it in this particular case. And what about multi-utilities poles ? IMHO they definetly can't only be identified by power=* tag. *François Lacombe* francois

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-02 Thread alessandro zardo
It's already used for the poles but don't you think it's transformers which deserve the most the usage of power=* ? In this case no. From an electrical viewpoint the transformer is of course important. However, is this the most important aspect for the average user? You see a pole in a row

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-02 Thread François Lacombe
And how would you map such things ? Concrete mast with low voltage power line, wifi antenna and communication cables. http://www.satcontact.fr/sites/default/files/SIEA-pbbt1.jpg Concrete poles with optical fiber and medium voltage power line.

Re: [Tagging] How to determine the value for admin_level?

2013-09-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/9/1 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com As Frederik points out, admin_level=8 is typically used for town, city, or municipality. To the extent that (some) administrative divisions in Nepal are functionally similar to administrative divisions in other countries, using the same admin_level

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-02 Thread fly
Thanks for the pictures ! We are taking loops only to come back to the conclusion that a pole is a pole. It does not matter what is mounted but we need to be able to tag several objects mounted. man_made=pole communication=receiver power=transformer On 02.09.2013 11:48, François Lacombe

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-02 Thread François Lacombe
2013/9/2 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com Thanks for the pictures ! We are taking loops only to come back to the conclusion that a pole is a pole. It does not matter what is mounted but we need to be able to tag several objects mounted. That's what I'm trying to explain... Even if the

[Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

2013-09-02 Thread fly
Hey water=intermiitent and water=tidal contradict with natural=water plus water=* and do not totally fit with waterway=* I suggest to deprecate these two tags in favour of intermittent=yes/no and tidal=yes/no with defaults set to no. cu fly ___

Re: [Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

2013-09-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/9/2 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com Hey water=intermiitent and water=tidal contradict with natural=water plus water=* and do not totally fit with waterway=* I suggest to deprecate these two tags in favour of intermittent=yes/no and tidal=yes/no with defaults set to no. shouldn't

Re: [Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

2013-09-02 Thread fly
On 02.09.2013 17:09, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2013/9/2 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com Hey water=intermiitent and water=tidal contradict with natural=water plus water=* and do not totally fit with waterway=* I suggest to deprecate these two tags in favour of

Re: [Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

2013-09-02 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Monday 02 September 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: but admittedly the alternative approach (intermettent=yes) is used ~3 times more often... Of which 90% are from imports as well. The number of water features manually tagged as intermittent is sadly negligible. But yes,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-02 Thread Ole Nielsen
On 02/09/2013 09:58, François Lacombe wrote: Ok, but 'yes' has to be added to the transformer=* table of values in the proposal. Done, but with the recommendation to use a more specific value such as distribution if possible. It isn't for now, that's why I thought we can't use it in this

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-02 Thread François Lacombe
2013/9/2 Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl On 02/09/2013 09:58, François Lacombe wrote: Ok, but 'yes' has to be added to the transformer=* table of values in the proposal. Done, but with the recommendation to use a more specific value such as distribution if possible. Nice. Thank you. You

Re: [Tagging] Micro mapping traffic signals

2013-09-02 Thread Paul Johnson
On Aug 28, 2013 8:17 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: But another point is traffic signals where a bicycle can ignore red light stop when he is turning to right (right-hand traffic). This is allowed in some coutries, sometimes only with a specific road sign. I don't know how it is tagged

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for a pack station?

2013-09-02 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
Here's an example pack station: http://www.kennedymeadows.com/ I'd say the horse operation is first a *coral*. Second it is the type of coral that has *offerings for the public.* And third it offers *cargo transport via horse.* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding as you noted use a more

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for a pack station?

2013-09-02 Thread Tod Fitch
Thank you for the suggestion. Turns out that the operation at Kennedy Meadows is quite a bit bigger with restaurant, lodging, store, etc. That is up the highway from the one I'm tagging but I'm following your suggestion minus the animal_boarding, feeding, etc. as it appears from the operator's

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for a pack station?

2013-09-02 Thread John F. Eldredge
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: Here's an example pack station: http://www.kennedymeadows.com/ I'd say the horse operation is first a *coral*. Second it is the type of coral that has *offerings for the public.* And third it offers *cargo transport via horse.*