On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 August 2013 12:44, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
IMHO use amenity=ranger_station - no need to hide it in a subtag. If this
is anglo centric other people where this feature doesn't exist simply
2013/9/3 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
operator=[nps/usfs]
not sure if this was intended literally, but I'd suggest not to use
abbreviations, for instance nps could be national park service, national
party of switzerland or nikon professional services (or a lot more).
cheers,
Martin
Hi,
There are really fancy problems to discuss these days...
Since there is an operator=* tag well documented on wiki, why can't we
introduce a page for an owner=* one ?
As you maybe know, the owner of an infrastructure (public transports,
facilities network, public services, etc) and the
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:59 AM, François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu wrote:
Operator could be given by operator=* and the effective owner by a new
owner=* tag.
What about when a business is owned by one entity, but operated on
their behalf by another, in a building that they
On 9/3/13 7:31 AM, John Sturdy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:59 AM, François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu wrote:
Operator could be given by operator=* and the effective owner by a new
owner=* tag.
What about when a business is owned by one entity, but operated on
their
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
it's also something that's subject to change and therefore creates a
maintence issue. i guess i want to know whether this enables anything
that makes the maintenece effort worth it. my fear of course is that
we end up
On 2013-09-03 13:45, Richard Welty wrote:
On 9/3/13 7:31 AM, John Sturdy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:59 AM, François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu wrote: Operator could be given
by operator=* and the effective owner by a new owner=* tag. What
about when a business is owned
On 2013-09-03 12:59, François Lacombe
wrote :
Hi,
There are really fancy problems to discuss these days...
Since there is an
Il giorno 03/set/2013, alle ore 13:31, John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
does owner= refer to the business, or the building?
you should map distinct objects for the building and the business (e.g. a node
inside the building or a mp-relation for the business with the building as
Il giorno 03/set/2013, alle ore 13:58, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl ha
scritto:
Unfortunately the whole world is subject to change. Where does one draw the
line? Data must have a life expectancy of more than 1 year? Which
deliberately does not refer to the age of the information by
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
What François forgot to mention is that the current wiki page of
operator ([1]) is questionable.
It says:
The operator tag is used to name a company, corporation, person or
any other entity who is in charge of the
2013/9/3 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
but :
Useful to describe that a certain map object belongs to a company
or corporation in any way.
This definition suggests that operator is also the owner...
maybe we should change this into some way, so it doesn't (IMHO) imply
property?
Looking at
Hi,
Many thanks for your answers.
+1 with Martin Koppenhoefer, let's update the wiki according to that.
@Pieren : As said on french list, belongs to on the operator tag's page
may refer to the obligation the operator have regarding the infrastructure
without implying propery (as Martin said).
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
i might look up hardware or hardware store. i probably wouldn't
specify brand/franchise, but i'd want to see it in the results, e.g.
Name Franchise Distance/Direction
On 9/3/13 1:18 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
With the URL one can argue that no other details are needed.
think about it in terms of what you would search for and what
you would want to see in the results.
i might look up hardware or hardware store. i probably wouldn't
specify brand/franchise,
sorry, I'm in my first proposal.
you can voting the proposal via_ferrata?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata
--
Dario Zontini
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
To see how it feels, I've started to tag my local area with:
utilities=underground
In areas where I know that all overhead wires have been undergrounded. A
complete tag list might be:
utilities=underground ( no overhead utilities are present )
utilities=overhead (overhead wires are visible)
17 matches
Mail list logo