Re: [Tagging] funny tags: turning_radius

2013-09-05 Thread André Pirard
On 2013-09-04 15:50, Ronnie Soak wrote : > 2013/8/30 Frederik Ramm mailto:frede...@remote.org>> > > Hi, > > On 29.08.2013 16:07, André Pirard wrote: > > "This tag was created for the specific needs > > of logging [to tell which timbering vehicle can pass a bend]" > > More backgr

Re: [Tagging] School and training

2013-09-05 Thread Fernando Trebien
Well, using amenity=school would have the advantage of immediate support by current renderers and applications and no need for new tags. While being "tagging for the application", it doesn't sounds so incorrect to me (but I must admit it may be due to the language barrier). Would it be wrong to com

Re: [Tagging] School and training

2013-09-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/9/5 Fernando Trebien > Hello everyone, > > Here in Brazil we have started discussing special cases for tagging > ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Refer%C3%AAncia#Casos_espec.C3.ADficos > ). > > There are two common cases that don't seem to be covered by OSM yet: > l

[Tagging] School and training

2013-09-05 Thread Fernando Trebien
Hello everyone, Here in Brazil we have started discussing special cases for tagging (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Refer%C3%AAncia#Casos_espec.C3.ADficos). There are two common cases that don't seem to be covered by OSM yet: language schools and cram schools. I found thi

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 48, Issue 11

2013-09-05 Thread Marc Gemis
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:00 PM, wrote: > Personally I don't think underground services should be mapped in the > OSM database. Id you can't view it, it shouldn't be a primary tag. > Then why are the administrative borders of countries, provinces, cities, etc. in OSM ? In many cases the only plac

Re: [Tagging] Utility corridor mapping

2013-09-05 Thread Dave F.
On 04/09/2013 06:21, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: To see how it feels, I've started to tag my local area with: utilities=underground Personally I don't think underground services should be mapped in the OSM database. Id you can't view it, it shouldn't be a primary tag. Such data can be useful,

Re: [Tagging] Utility corridor mapping

2013-09-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/9/5 Ronnie Soak > utilities:communications=underground > instead of communications we could distinguish cable tv, fibre optic cables and copper cables (phone, DSL, ...) and maybe more. If there isn't any detail (read: knowledge by the mapper) it also seems unnecessary to map this kind of s

Re: [Tagging] Utility corridor mapping

2013-09-05 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
Most direct and least expandable is: overhead_cables=[yes/no] overhead_utilities=[yes/no] or utilities = power; fibre; sewage or [none] utilities:overhead = [yes/no] ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/list