Re: [Tagging] Visual editor for the wiki (WAS: How to overcome lack of consensus)

On 2013-09-29 00:50, Clifford Snow wrote : > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:38 PM, André Pirard > mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Only gotcha, I think: recent Ubuntu comes with a desktop called > Unity which is very resource consuming, dancing but not singing, > and is really

Re: [Tagging] Visual editor for the wiki (WAS: How to overcome lack of consensus)

On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:56 PM, André Pirard wrote: > Ouch, from LibreOffice menu and help, it looks like it's only able to > store a wiki file, not to read and edit it. > Pretty much useless. > Not sure - on my version of LibreOffice, I can connect to wiki.openoffice.org with my userid and pass

Re: [Tagging] Visual editor for the wiki (WAS: How to overcome lack of consensus)

On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:38 PM, André Pirard wrote: > Only gotcha, I think: recent Ubuntu comes with a desktop called Unity > which is very resource consuming, dancing but not singing, and is really > crawling on VB. There are solutions to tame > Unity

Re: [Tagging] Visual editor for the wiki (WAS: How to overcome lack of consensus)

Ouch, from LibreOffice menu and help, it looks like it's only able to store a wiki file, not to read and edit it. Pretty much useless. André. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013/9/28 Michał Sałaban > > I realized it is not easy to make a distinction between canal and > aqueduct, but we may assume that the latter is usually for drinking > water or irrigation of small areas of land. Everything dealing with > navigation, flood protection or vast area irrigation would b

Re: [Tagging] Visual editor for the wiki (WAS: How to overcome lack of consensus)

On 2013-09-27 13:51, André Pirard wrote : > On 2013-09-17 21:49, Rob Nickerson wrote : >> >> Daniel wrote: >> > - Make it easier to edit the wiki. >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I agree - the wiki can be hard to edit if you have never done this >> before. This is why I requested a visual editor (that is n

Re: [Tagging] Pre-proposal: gambling

In Belgium we have - Casino (as in most other countries) - Slot machines and other gambling equipment in pubs - Gambling arcades a.k.a. amusement arcades with slot machines - Permanent betting offices for betting on horse races, soccer games etc.. - Occasional betting offices typically on horse rac

Re: [Tagging] Hiking route abandoned

On 2013-09-28 14:09, bredy wrote : > I have one hiking route with relation that was abandoned by the operator. Now > do I have to cancell the relation or for the moment is better to tag > abandoned:ref= and abandoned:operator= in the relation? > Thanks It probably depends on its popularity, on the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

Who decided the start of voting? Is just 2 yaers without no discussion. The feature is good for alpin tagging. If none that write the proposal are present I try to restart the process. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-via-ferrata-tp5776186p57

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Bridge types)

Dave, I'm officially agnostic on that question! I know both "tunnel=culvert" and "culvert=yes" are used much more frequently in OSM than "bridge=culvert"; I think one of them predominates, but I don't know which. Yours, -- Chris Hoess On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: >

[Tagging] Hiking route abandoned

I have one hiking route with relation that was abandoned by the operator. Now do I have to cancell the relation or for the moment is better to tag abandoned:ref= and abandoned:operator= in the relation? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Hiking-route-abandone

Re: [Tagging] Pre-proposal: gambling

On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:29 +0200, Colin Smale wrote: > I would recommend making a clear distinction between the premises and > the activity. Lotteries are rarely carried out in shops, but the > tickets are sold in all manner of establishments with a different > primary purpose. And whether you can

Re: [Tagging] Pre-proposal: gambling

2013/9/28 Colin Smale > I would recommend making a clear distinction between the premises and the > activity. Lotteries are rarely carried out in shops, but the tickets are > sold in all manner of establishments with a different primary purpose. And > whether you can ever call gambling an amenity

Re: [Tagging] Pre-proposal: gambling

I would recommend making a clear distinction between the premises and the activity. Lotteries are rarely carried out in shops, but the tickets are sold in all manner of establishments with a different primary purpose. And whether you can ever call gambling an amenity (for the public good) is ope

Re: [Tagging] Pre-proposal: gambling

2013/9/28 Matthijs Melissen > There are currently various tags for gambling-related shops and amenities > in use, including amenity=casino, shop=bookmaker, shop=betting, > shop=lottery, and shop=gambling. See here for an overview of usage > statistics: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?