Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways
On 14 October 2013 16:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2013/10/14 Richard Mann >> >> bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing > > +1, for routing that should be sufficient, but not for mapping ;-) > If they are explicitly forbidden on all ways it would not be bad to have it > on all ways as explicit tag (IMHO). That rather depends on whether bicycle=no is interpreted to mean "no cycling" or "no bicycles" -- which seems to be the key thing we need to agree on first. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Substation proposal approved - and a suggestion for a post-vote change
Render update ticket has been created on git hub : https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/230 Cheers. *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com 2013/10/13 François Lacombe > > 2013/10/13 Ole Nielsen / osm > >> I surely wouldn't associate CERN with "distribution". They may have their >> own internal industrial distribution network but "substation=industrial" >> is more appropriate for such internal facilities. >> > > +1 substation=industrial > > >> The idea behind "transmission" and "distribution" is to provide data >> consumers a hint about the role of the substation without having to look >> for the voltage tag (which may be missing or having multiple ;-separated >> values). The 100 kV specified threshold is only a guideline and if the >> mapper think that a 70 kV substation is mainly for transmission then it >> may be indicated as such. Another example: 132/10 kV substations are not >> uncommon in Denmark and they seem most appropriately to be considered >> distribution stations. >> > > The question is to know which is the target of that kind of "hint" and > will everyone will understand it as such ? > > You're assuming 132 kV/10 kV substation are for distribution because you > find 10 kV inside but operator can use it a way OSM won't know. > > That's why I'm tagging substation=transmission each time voltage goes > above 30 kV inside the substation. IMHO > > >> I'm open to suggestions for alternatives to "distribution". Martin >> suggested "local_distribution" which is a bit long but otherwise a >> possibility. Some other ideas: "local" or "minor"?. I am just looking for >> a way to clearly distinguish those low voltage substations from other >> substations. >> > > > >> BTW, "transformer=distribution" is currently defined as meaning a >> transformer supplying low voltage! >> > > I'm ok with that. > > > > *François Lacombe* > > francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu > http://www.infos-reseaux.com > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
