On Mon, Oct 21, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> The wiki states "If it is 24 hours 7 days a week [opening_hours] has a
> specific value: 24/7. this way it can render a specific icon."
There are quite a few Starbucks locations that Starbucks themselves
consider 24 hour stores, but which
On 2013-10-21 19:07, Eckhart Wörner wrote :
> Hi André,
>
> Am Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2013, 19:19:35 schrieb André Pirard:
>> No, that is completely wrong. 24/7 is *not* meant to be used as a building
>> block.
>> Where is that explained and is it correctly explained if readers understand
>> it "co
Hi André,
Am Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2013, 19:19:35 schrieb André Pirard:
> […loads of quoted text…]
please do not quote an entire conversation on top of your reply, otherwise
people have a hard time finding your actual reply.
> No, that is completely wrong. 24/7 is *not* meant to be used as a buil
Dear all,
# Proposal
I propose to automatically change all objects tagged with
shop=musical_instruments into shop=musical_instrument.
# Rationale
Currently, some shops for music instruments are tagged with the
singular form shop=musical_instrument, while others are tagged with
the plural form s
On Monday 21 October 2013, Tyrfing OSM wrote:
>
> Yes, changing the definition of a tag is a problem.
>
> Like Kytömaa points out it seems like the jumping distinction has
> become stricter during the years: "Maybe you can just jump over it"
> (2007), "An active person should be able to jump over i
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> As far as verifiability is concerned - it seems the question how far an
> able person can jump is not an issue here. As i said before i would
> interpret the rule from a practical standpoint, i.e. tag as stream if i
> generally would as
Dear all,
The tag shop=musical_instrument has been accepted. There have been 12
people who voted, of which 11 voted in favour of the proposal and 1
against.
Thanks everyone who voted.
(Announcing the results of votes seems not common practice, but I
think it would be a good habit.)
-- Matthijs
2013/10/19 Christoph Hormann
> Which leads me to the rule itself which - as noted previously - does not
> make much sense as a mandatory top level distinction for waterways.
> But it has been around for a long time and a lot of data has been
> tagged based on it. This in my opinion means changin
> Am 20/ott/2013 um 22:22 schrieb Dan S :
>
> we should
> have a separate no-pushing-bicycles tag that's not part of bicycle=*
> ("bicycle:pushed=*"...? or is there anything in actual use?)
not sure about actual use, but I'd prefer bicycle_pushing=no or
pushing_bicycle=no or sth. different fo
