Surely the boundary way itself is unlikely to have a name, other than a
synthetic a/b boundary? Unless of course the name refers to some
feature like a road or a river which in a specific case may be part of
the boundary. As administrative bodies (and their boundaries) are
usually hierarchical
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Surely the boundary way itself is unlikely to have a name, other than a
synthetic a/b boundary?
To clarify, my remark was just about the tag name in the two
relations which are indeed identical excepted the admin_level
OK, sorry if I misunderstood.
On 2013-11-06 11:25, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Surely the boundary way itself is unlikely to have a name, other than a
synthetic a/b boundary?
To clarify, my remark was just about the tag
I read the page Classification_of_Powerlines
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Classification_of_Powerlines
and for power line there are electric line, phone line, ecc
--
View this message in context:
2013/11/6 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
Now I see that the county free big city. is incorrect. If the admin
level exists but is just matching another level boundary, we duplicate
the relation in my country since years. See for instance
- Paris, the municipality (city), level 8 :
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
but ARE there such things as Paris level 8 AND Paris level 6 (i.e. are there
governments for both levels, or is there only one government?), or is there
just one Paris level 6 which has also the
2013/11/6 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
It's two different adminitrative levels. In this particular case, it's
also two different administrations but does it count since we just
identify admin boundaries ?
good question, one might argue that if there is only one administration,
maybe there
Gilbert Hangartner kuessemondtaegl...@gmail.com writes:
I wrote a proposal to correctly tag Crèches or Childcare-centres
or Daycare-centrers or Kindertagesstätte. Thank you in advance for
your comments and thoughts.
My reaction on seeing the subject was that creches are not amenities,
but
I like that idea Martin, I've added a link to the playground tag for
tagging individual pieces of equipment (if anyone feels the need to).
Should I just start the voting by putting today's date, or do you
think it should be left for more comments first?
Thanks,
Dom
On 5 November 2013 14:57,
On 14:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC), [[User:Ypid|Ypid]] wrote :
I am not sure if we need two syntax diagrams. Sorry that the syntax
diagram I added to the Wiki ([[Key:opening_hours:specification]]) was
not so obvious.
Oh yes, OSM taggers badly need an easier to read syntax diagram.
I spent more
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:32:08PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/11/6 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
It's two different adminitrative levels. In this particular case, it's
also two different administrations but does it count since we just
identify admin boundaries ?
good question,
Administrative boundaries are defined by a unique administrative instance ?
Let's take the problem the other way around:
Is this boundary x an admin level 6? If yes, create a level 6 relation.
Is this boundary x an admin level 8? If yes, create a level 8 relation.
Do you want to know if a
Following my message that my Simplified Opening Hours syntax diagram
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Simplified_syntax_diagram
is needed for taggers to achieve 95% of such tags correctly in a
reasonable time and, most of all, that data consumers understand what
they tagged, I
2013/11/6 Yves yve...@gmail.com
Let's take the problem the other way around:
Is this boundary x an admin level 6? If yes, create a level 6 relation.
Is this boundary x an admin level 8? If yes, create a level 8 relation.
Do you want to know if a relation is similar to another one ? Define
14 matches
Mail list logo
