On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com wrote:
Just use the semi-colon to separate the values:
religion=religion1;religion2;;religionX
This is the short answer. But we have seen in the past that
semi-colon, aggregated values are finally almost never used. And
Semicolons are the perfect measure to denote a feature that has more
than one value. It is important to use it, even if renderers are
reluctant to implement it. The more it is used, the higher the pressure
to them to implement it.
Zecke
Am 13.01.2014 10:28, schrieb Pieren:
On Mon, Jan 13,
I don't think it is in general possible to derive the trafficability
information from physical models.
In cases like flooded it is possible because the model is very
simple and the information needed
(trafficability) can be obtained in a very simple way. The variability
of possible interpretations
In contrast, if the information that the road can be passed by off
road vehicles is given by local people
then it is probably very reliable. It is not interpretation, it is
experience.
If these local people are somewhat responsible, their answer could only be:
It depends.
As mentioned
2014/1/13 Ronnie Soak chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com:
In contrast, if the information that the road can be passed by off
road vehicles is given by local people
then it is probably very reliable. It is not interpretation, it is
experience.
If these local people are somewhat responsible,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:47 PM, BGNO BGNO bgno2...@gmail.com wrote:
The information which people gave me about the mentioned 20km long
road was: Yes you can use the road with a regular car if it doesn't
rain. I think it is practicable to tag that information into OSM. How
would you tag that
Anectotal evidence: while driving around Iceland in a Suzuki Jimny
(technically a 4x4),
I would never try to tag that half hour of prose into an OSM key.
Would it not benefit the next driver to know somebody in a (stock) Jimny got
through - or didn't? Even for those driving something else. The
I propose to move psv (including taxi and bus) from the vehicle classes
section to the section by use, because that's what it is.
I agree. (Usage, that relies on the current hierarchy should be limited to
non-existent)
Country differences again. Around here (Finland) all signs(* refer to just
2014/1/13 Kytömaa Lauri lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi
Country differences again. Around here (Finland) all signs(* refer to just
vehicles registered as a bus, even those that allow buses and taxis on
their own lanes. Effectively nobody would try to use a personal bus
anyway, because the extra
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
In the areas I cross country ski at in the California mountains many
trails are used by both nordic skiers and snowshoers. Since I am ski
centric I've tended to tag them as piste:type=nordic. Could one simply tag
them as
Hi,
I propose to move psv (including taxi and bus) from the
vehicle classes section to the section by use, because that's
what it is.
maybe that is what it should have been in the past.
Sadly the actual use in real world tagging seems to interpret bus also
as vehicle
Hi,
sorry, made a mistake:
2) If other restrictions (maxweight or - more precisely - maxgcweight,
maxgcweightrating or maxactualweight) are made conditional, we need an
update of our conditional tagging, for example by introducing use:
Of course this is already possible in conditional
On 1/13/14 1:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
psv reads public service vehicle, clearly a use type. e.g. busses
is correct as is i.e. busses and taxis (but the latter might forget
some other kind of psv). Still this clearly doesn't include any buses
(vehicle class, usually vehicles with more
2014/1/13 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
we may need to spend some time on this. the turn restriction
plugin for josm uses psv, but seemingly with the implication of
emergency/service vehicles (not including buses and taxis) for
things like u-turns on motorways.
i think we need some
On 1/13/14 2:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014/1/13 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
we may need to spend some time on this. the turn restriction
plugin for josm uses psv, but seemingly with the implication of
emergency/service vehicles (not including buses and taxis) for
things
2014/1/13 Zecke z...@saeuferleber.de
Semicolons are the perfect measure to denote a feature that has more than
one value. It is important to use it, even if renderers are reluctant to
implement it. The more it is used, the higher the pressure to them to
implement it.
perfect? You will
Bryce,
There is already a documented scheme for snowshoeing:
piste:type=hike + piste:grooming=backcountry (250 use)
With piste:type=hike + piste:grooming=classic being for 'winter hiking'
(111 use).
Yves
On 01/13/2014 08:02 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Tod Fitch
On 13 January 2014 07:16, Nirab Pudasaini developer.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
Pashupatinath is a major place of worship for Hindus. It is also a place of
worship for Buddhists. The tag amenity:place_of_worship has a key religion:*
but how can we add place of worship which are for multiple
Obvious issue: 200,000 uses of bus...
OK, probably most of them are associated with public_transport (e.g. bus
stops). So the number of bus related access-restrictions is probably
much lower.
martinq
___
Tagging mailing list
I started mapping in Jan 2008. By that time it was already clear that
psv was taxis and buses. If we start questioning every consensus (even
those documented on central pages of the wiki like the access-page) we
can stop mapping now ;-)
I have interpreted psv (public service VEHICLE), bus and
On 2014-01-13 10:50, Zecke wrote :
Am 13.01.2014 10:28, schrieb Pieren:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Martin Vonwald
imagic@gmail.com wrote:
Just use the semi-colon to separate the values:
religion=religion1;religion2;;religionX
This is the short answer. But we have seen in the
Am 13.01.2014 23:18, schrieb André Pirard:
I also would feel like accepting the semicolon, but after thinking
twice I notice that
religion=religion1;religion2;;religion
denomination=denomination1;denomination2
would become even more problematic already.
Why? Of course, you must include
BGNO, you have been following the Tags useful for rendering of roads in
poor conditions thread started by Fernando on this same list haven't
you ?
I have created a summary page on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Davo
We hope to reach a consensus on what seems pretty close to what
23 matches
Mail list logo
