2014-03-23 2:37 GMT+01:00 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
Left-hand-driver cars are sometimes used in right-hand-drive countries,
and vice versa. So, changing cars at a national border where the driving
conventions differ is not mandatory in all cases. In fact, I have not
heard of any
I think having only one value (driving_side=opposite (or inverted)) would be
better to tag highways.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/03/2014 14:24, Tobias Knerr wrote:
I agree: let's leave it as-is but add the possibility of using it on ways
Of course no ordinary car is going to use those tracks. Keep in main the
track definition:
Roads for agricultural use, forest tracks etc.
Cars are not agricultural vehicles and they should not be used as a
reference when we are talking about tracks. By agricultural vehicles, the
main and almost
None of those tracks should be used for tracking, they are not meant for
cars. Most of the time they will end in someone's land/property anyways.
2014-03-21 1:29 GMT+01:00 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
But at least now I know I need to review my values more
pessimistically.
I agree we should find a tag to note practicability. Tracktype would be
great, but actual grades are only applicable when there terrain is mostly
earth and no rocks. That's the reason I put those pics. Hard surface does
not mean anything about how good a track is to use vehicles in, and
surface
If it's someone's property, it should have an access=private tag. Some
owners may allow passage (access=permissive), in which case tracks
would be routable and likely interesting shortcuts. The routing app
needs to decide whether the shortcut is worth the trouble.
Besides, tracktype can be used
Hi All,
I have some winter gritting/salting routes that I am trying to work out how
best to tag them. I was thinking of creating a route relation, but I may
need to add some new roles:
* forward:grit implies the gritting truck grits this road whilst
travelling in the direction of the way.
*
Hi Rob,
it's only a warning of josm. Read it as: Hey, you made something which
may be an error. Are you sure it's what you wanted to do? and if you
answer this question with yes, ignore it
On the other hand:
What's the benefit of having gritting routes in osm? are they stable?
Are they followed
Thanks,
Happy to ignore JOSMs error, but don't want to have someone else change my
route relation if it flags as a QA bug (hence posting here to gather
people's thoughts ideas).
They're as stable as bus routes in my area as the local authority has to
ensure the correct roads are gritted and the
