Re: [Tagging] layer=-1, rivers, bridges and tunnels

2014-04-05 Thread Richard Z.
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:41:56PM +0200, André Pirard wrote: Hi, Regarding normalized layers. If I can believe my eyes, bridges/culverts are under (uninterrupted foil) roads http://www.hdtimelapse.net/content/HDtimelapse.net_City/HDtimelapse.net_City_3290_hirez.jpg: bridge=road-1.

Re: [Tagging] layer=-1, rivers, bridges and tunnels

2014-04-05 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Sat, 5 Apr 2014, Richard Z. wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:41:56PM +0200, André Pirard wrote: In addition, key:layer *is not* rendering layer/order. One example, a road is going through a forest, both should have implicit key:layer ==0. Obviously they still have a defined

Re: [Tagging] layer=-1, rivers, bridges and tunnels

2014-04-05 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 05.04.2014 21:17, Richard Z. wrote: If the road (for whichever reason, valid or not) has layer=-1 and the forest just the implicit layer==0, the road should still be drawn above the forest. I don't think that this idea is universally accepted. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ##

Re: [Tagging] simple_brunnel : one node bridge like xing highway over waterway

2014-04-05 Thread John F. Eldredge
You are being asked, is the word brunnel one you coined, or is it in use already by other people? Pointing to a page you wrote is not an answer to the question. On April 3, 2014 5:06:54 PM CDT, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM +0100, Dave F. wrote:

Re: [Tagging] simple_brunnel : one node bridge like xing highway over waterway

2014-04-05 Thread Richard Welty
On 4/5/14 4:52 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: You are being asked, is the word brunnel one you coined, or is it in use already by other people? Pointing to a page you wrote is not an answer to the question. it appears to me that brunnel is defined in the GDF (Geographic Data File) format. but

Re: [Tagging] shop for baby strollers only

2014-04-05 Thread John F. Eldredge
For that matter, when I have seen the term pushchair in British books, it has always referred to what Americans call a wheelchair, used for transporting adults or older children who are temporarily or permanently unable to walk. On April 4, 2014 6:57:08 AM CDT, Dave Swarthout

Re: [Tagging] shop for baby strollers only

2014-04-05 Thread Philip Barnes
We use the term wheelchair in the same way as Americans, a pushchair is used to transport young children, what Americans call a stroller. I have never heard of a wheelchair, referred to as a pushchair, what books was that? Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 05/04/2014 22:39

Re: [Tagging] shop for baby strollers only

2014-04-05 Thread Steve Doerr
On 05/04/2014 22:39, John F. Eldredge wrote: For that matter, when I have seen the term pushchair in British books, it has always referred to what Americans call a wheelchair, used for transporting adults or older children who are temporarily or permanently unable to walk. I've never heard

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

2014-04-05 Thread John F. Eldredge
If you don't use noexit=yes on ways, what do you use it on? I don't see that it would be meaningful on nodes, areas, or relations. On April 4, 2014 9:14:24 AM CDT, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote: On

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

2014-04-05 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-04-06 00:07, John F. Eldredge wrote : If you don't use noexit=yes on ways, what do you use it on? How do you understand "Use the noexit=yes tag on the node at the end of a highway=* ..."? If you read the wiki page very very carefully, you

Re: [Tagging] shop for baby strollers only

2014-04-05 Thread John F. Eldredge
I don't have the titles at hand, but it was in several Victorian and Edwardian novels. On April 5, 2014 5:01:36 PM CDT, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: We use the term wheelchair in the same way as Americans, a pushchair is used to transport young children, what Americans call a

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

2014-04-05 Thread Dave Swarthout
I think the Wiki is abundantly clear on the usage of this tag. I says, among other things, that it is to be used on a node, not on a way, and that This tag is mainly useful where a road or path ends close to another way but where it isn't possible to get through due to a barrier or other

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

2014-04-05 Thread John F. Eldredge
Well, at least on my part, the confusion was because I was thinking in terms of the no exit sign, which is always posted at the entrance to a cul-de-sac, not at the end of it. On April 5, 2014 8:00:27 PM CDT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: I think the Wiki is abundantly clear

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

2014-04-05 Thread fly
On 06.04.2014 03:13, John F. Eldredge wrote: Well, at least on my part, the confusion was because I was thinking in terms of the no exit sign, which is always posted at the entrance to a cul-de-sac, not at the end of it. Do we need a link to traffic_sign=* ? noexit=yes has nothing in common