The same is true for cycling and equestrian networks with numbered nodes.
There are a few of those networks in Germany as well.
These are not collections/categories. They are networks of route relations.
Jo
2014-07-16 5:23 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis :
> In Belgium and The Netherlands a network-relat
In Belgium and The Netherlands a network-relation is used to group together
all nodes and routes of a walking network. This avoids that we have to
repeat the name, operator, etc. on each route (signposted path between 2
nodes) and the nodes.
m.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Pieren wrote:
>
2014-07-15 19:47 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić :
> Making a rank or importance attribute is entirely subjective. It might as
> well be a tag like importance:according_to:Bob=5.
> If it was objective, then there could be a number like
> annual_number_of_tourists=35 or annual_number_of_pilgrims=14
Making a rank or importance attribute is entirely subjective. It might as
well be a tag like importance:according_to:Bob=5.
If it was objective, then there could be a number like
annual_number_of_tourists=35 or annual_number_of_pilgrims=140. For
economic importance some other figure, a numb
On 13/07/2014 19:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dofficial
access=designated "often includes ways that have no legal dedication
like e.g. recommended routes of a local bicycle club"
Presumably here you don't actually mean "access=designa
On 13.07.2014 20:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dofficial
> access=designated "often includes ways that have no legal dedication
> like e.g. recommended routes of a local bicycle club"
>
> Is it OK to use this tag in situations like this?
Am 15.07.2014 17:58, schrieb Pieren:
I discover that OSM contains 1575 relations of "type=network"
(taginfo). I guess its definition is coming from this wiki proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Network
As a hint for further inverstigations: I guess this might be public
I discover that OSM contains 1575 relations of "type=network"
(taginfo). I guess its definition is coming from this wiki proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Network
Quotes:
"A network groups together routes that share common characteristics,
e.g. a common operator, a co
2014-07-14 20:39 GMT+02:00 Steve Doerr :
> And also, a dormitory is a communal facility containing two or more beds -
> otherwise it's just a bedroom.
>
it can be also a part of a monastery...
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstree
2014-07-14 21:38 GMT+02:00 Christian Quest :
> Not worse than the current osm.org rendering... but I agree that it is
> weird ;)
>
agreed (besides the z<5 for NE and class 0, which looks more or less
reasonable to me)
> It is not catched by my query because there is no capital=* tag on it.
>
2014-07-14 23:10 GMT+02:00 Dudley Ibbett :
> I'm trying to work out exactly how a generic "field" would be mapped using
> this new tag.
I'm using landuse=farmland on the individual field, and there are other
mappers who do the same around here. You can add crop=* to specify the crop
if you like
2014-07-14 16:04 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> thank you for setting this up. There are some comments on the talk-page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Cemetery_sector
>
Thanks! In my town, these got tagged as place=locality, and, while I
couldn't agree the least w
12 matches
Mail list logo
