I would like to distinguish between hiking paths and climbing_access paths.
In my area only climbers are allowed to use the paths to access the cliffs.
Therefore I thought of this tagging for climbing_access paths:
access=customers
customers=climbers
what I found so far:
I understand access=customers, it is okay tag for this case. But what does
customers=climbers mean? How do you distinguish climbers from others?..
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/customers#values says there 25
instances with 4 values, but what exactly do they mean?
If customers=climbers
Wouldn't it be better to use the sac_scale [1] instead of artificially
limiting it to customers ?
regards
m
[1 ]http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:51 AM, k4r573n k4r5...@googlemail.com wrote:
I would like to distinguish between hiking paths and
The sac_scale is about difficulty, not permission. I assume from
Karsten's original message that only climbers are permitted to use
those paths. If so, then access=customers is appropriate, and
customers=climbers seems helpful...
Dan
2014-08-07 9:50 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
On 07.08.2014 09:51, k4r573n wrote:
I would like to distinguish between hiking paths and climbing_access paths.
In my area only climbers are allowed to use the paths to access the cliffs.
Therefore I thought of this tagging for climbing_access paths:
access=customers
customers=climbers
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 10:03 +0100, Dan S wrote:
The sac_scale is about difficulty, not permission. I assume from
Karsten's original message that only climbers are permitted to use
those paths. If so, then access=customers is appropriate, and
customers=climbers seems helpful...
Customers
There are like 20x amenity=jobcentre and 65x amenity=job_centre.
Meanwhile office=employment_agency is used 1200x
On
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jobcentre_%28plus%29 you
find:
Currently unclear if that tag encompass government run job centres.
Checking in Germany
2014-08-07 11:14 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
Customers implies that climbers have to pay to climb, there is someone
controlling access, collecting money.
I would go for highway=path, access=climbers.
From how I understood the original poster I'd go for fee=yes
2014-08-07 11:48 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
There are like 20x amenity=jobcentre and 65x amenity=job_centre. Meanwhile
office=employment_agency is used 1200x
On http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/
Jobcentre_%28plus%29 you find:
Currently unclear if that
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 11:48 +0200, Andreas Goss wrote:
There are like 20x amenity=jobcentre and 65x amenity=job_centre.
Meanwhile office=employment_agency is used 1200x
On
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jobcentre_%28plus%29 you
find:
Currently unclear if that tag
If I understand Karsten correctly, the limitation is not about payment,
it is to limit the number of people using this path. This would be
typical for climbing crags in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conservation
areas.
A typical example is the sandstone climbing in Saxonia/Germany, which is
It would be very very wrong to try to merge Job Centre with employment
agency.
99% of Jobcenters in Germany are tagged as office=employment_agency, so
currently the distinction you point out does not exist.
Should we tag the government ones with amenity=jobcentre in addition?
But as Martin
2014-08-07 17:25 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
Wondering what to do with that? With just 687 objects worldwide the problem
would be easily fixable.. just how?
I think tagging the type of bridge as road attribute might be an
exxageration. We should start mapping bridges as
Good old Wiipedia helps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge#Types_of_bridges
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_bridge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_bridge
On 7 August 2014 17:25, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
Those are radically different types of bridges.. comparing
Yes. That is a navigable aqueduct bridge.
It is a structurally a viaduct with an aqueduct function on top. So how to
map these two orthogonal properties of this bridge? I would map this as
waterway=canal, bridge=viaduct, boat=yes, layer=x exactly as we do for a
road bridge. If you want you can
2014-08-07 19:06 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
An aqueduct is definitely a type of bridge, i.e. one carrying a
waterway, usually a canal over a road, river or valley.
The most famous, and scariest of them all
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontcysyllte_Aqueduct
yes,
On 7 August 2014 18:35, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, aqueducts will usually also have bridges as parts of them (not all,
some even run underground for instance).
Not true. In California the aqueducts look like navigable canals, but carry
drinking water.
Still this
17 matches
Mail list logo
