To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: [Tagging] bridges
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I d like to contribute to the bridge discusson
One
remark I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building, if you ad
it completely as a bridge to OSM. Th
This would be preferably tagged precisely with a whole new proposal like for
piste:difficulty, sac_scale, or whitewater:grade by speleo addicts, IMO.
On 14 août 2014 16:16:54 UTC+02:00, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
>2014-08-14 15:56 GMT+02:00 John F. Eldredge :
>
>> Plus, our mapping scheme is limi
On 8/15/14 1:09 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> This is just as bad as HTML 3.2's FONT tags and similar presentational
> junk. It's an excuse to add more garbage to the database, and I don't
> see the value it adds. The rendering does need to improve and be aware
> of new tags, but this doesn't help th
On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 16:12 +0200, André Pirard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's a well known fact that many people complain to tag in vain
> because what they tag doesn't show on the map (e.g. mini-golf vs
> tennis pitch), because they're told to open a rendering ticket which
> replies that only official ta
maybe it should be even easier for people to play with overpass turbo and
css. then you get the same effect
regards
m
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:31 PM, John Packer wrote:
>
>>- way: addr:housenumber=1; my_tag=nothing_known_elsewhere; render=pink
>>- way: addr:housenumber=2; other_tag=k
>
>
>- way: addr:housenumber=1; my_tag=nothing_known_elsewhere; render=pink
>- way: addr:housenumber=2; other_tag=known_only_by_me; render=yellow
>- way: addr:housebumber=3; my_private_tag=dont_use_it; render=violet
>- way: addr:housebumber=4; unique_tag=only_taginfo_knows_me;
>
What a nice map we would get :
* way: addr:housenumber=1; my_tag=nothing_known_elsewhere; render=pink
* way: addr:housenumber=2; other_tag=known_only_by_me; render=yellow
* way: addr:housebumber=3; my_private_tag=dont_use_it; render=violet
* way: addr:housebumber=4; unique_tag=only_taginfo_kn
Hi,
On 15 August 2014 16:29, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
> ZcSSxfsxzsvz CcCCf vfzzzdwzvbxcas cdzdzvxzdxzc
I'm afraid I can't understand a word you're saying.
--
Cheers,
Andrew
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstree
I noticed that this proposal received relatively little votes. Please
don't forget to vote.
-- Matthijs
On 12 August 2014 12:48, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup
>
> Voting starts. It's now only about a wiki cleanup, because
z
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
not a good idea IMHO.
1) what is the feature this tag should refer to? Consider a polygon that
is tagged as a building (building=yes) and a shop (shop=supermarked) and
a Walmart (operator=WalMart), and the mapper added RENDER=blue. What is
it that should be rendered blue? This object? Any supermark
Zxxfczhdxzsxxszcs cvszsx xszz
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Zzhvxdz
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
ZcSSxfsxzsvz CcCCf vfzzzdwzvbxcas cdzdzvxzdxzc
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
It's a well known fact that many people complain to tag in vain because
what they tag doesn't show on the map (e.g. mini-golf vs tennis pitch),
because they're told to open a rendering ticket which replies that only
official tags are supported, and because they open a vote for an
official tag
Hi,
First, let us not confuse speleology and tourism.
OSM is the most interesting for touristic caves to walk in 2D.
Speleologists have their own 3D maps showing where to crawl.
I worked in a touristic cave when I was a student and I can tell you
that the paths look very much like man-made, especi
Il giorno 13/ago/2014, alle ore 15:36, Andreas Goss ha
scritto:
>> I think it should be website:payment:bitcoin=yes instead of
>> payment:website:bitcoin=yes
>
> I think this makes sense for things like Wikidata, where you then have
> architect=* and architect:wikidata=* grouped together, bu
17 matches
Mail list logo