Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

2014-09-17 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Mapping contraflow lane as dual carriageway is a really poor idea. It is OK only for physically separated lane. 2014-09-17 1:59 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com: I map contraflow as dual carriageway, to avoid this issue. Both sides get oneway=yes, plus a full list of the modes

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a landmark clock

2014-09-17 Thread Volker Schmidt
Incidentally, this is a similar clock tower in Chile: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1905022230 (it's not rendered on Mapnik) On 16 September 2014 23:11, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org wrote: Andy Mabbett wrote on 2014-09-16 22:10: How should this clock:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-17 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote: For the junction! For a named junction with a (not named) traffic signal: junction=yes + highway=traffic_signals. (Quite common on Korea – on the ground, not in the database.) Ok, I improved the wiki about this

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a landmark clock

2014-09-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-09-17 10:12 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com: Incidentally, this is a similar clock tower in Chile: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1905022230 (it's not rendered on Mapnik) btw.: shouldn't this be analogue rather than the American version analog? I have opened an issue

[Tagging] landuse=grass = natural=grass

2014-09-17 Thread Daniel Koć
Hello, We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into natural=grass would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom a landuse (like the tree is natural=tree, not the amenity or something else). How do you find this idea? -- Mambałaga

Re: [Tagging] landuse=grass = natural=grass

2014-09-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Il giorno 17/set/2014, alle ore 23:44, Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl ha scritto: We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into natural=grass would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom a landuse from landuse, meadow would imply grass for me natural is mostly

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

2014-09-17 Thread Paul Johnson
Similar (albeit same direction) examples would be I 635 HOV in Dallas or US 75 HOV leading north from I 635. On Sep 17, 2014 2:30 AM, Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com wrote: Mapping contraflow lane as dual carriageway is a really poor idea. It is OK only for physically separated lane.

Re: [Tagging] landuse=grass = natural=grass

2014-09-17 Thread Dave F.
On 17/09/2014 22:44, Daniel Koć wrote: Hello, We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into natural=grass would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom a landuse (like the tree is natural=tree, not the amenity or something else). How do you find this idea? 1. I

[Tagging] Personal Keys for WikiProject, Survey Data for Import

2014-09-17 Thread Alex Rollin
Hello, We are surveying for local points of interest. We need to store an ID for these objects to keep track of them. I think this is called a personal key? Something like indonesiaheritage:ID=231892312 Is that the acceptable format for such a thing? We will then publish a page on the wiki

Re: [Tagging] Personal Keys for WikiProject, Survey Data for Import

2014-09-17 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
That is really poor idea. IMHO remembering location and object type should be enough to identify it. 2014-09-18 1:43 GMT+02:00 Alex Rollin alex.rol...@gmail.com: Hello, We are surveying for local points of interest. We need to store an ID for these objects to keep track of them. I think

Re: [Tagging] landuse=grass = natural=grass

2014-09-17 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 18.09.2014 01:01, Dave F. wrote: On 17/09/2014 22:44, Daniel Koć wrote: We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into natural=grass would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom a landuse (like the tree is natural=tree, not the amenity or something else). How do