Am 05.12.2014 um 21:30 schrieb Paul Johnson:
> How about site relations? Seems like a good use of a site relation.
As long as it possible to draw the whole site as a single polygon, there
is no need of a site relation.
cu fly
___
Tagging mailing list
Am 11.12.2014 um 23:25 schrieb François Lacombe:
> This is actually a great work.
> Thank you for the time spent to setup this document !
>
> Good luck for this vote :)
+1
Another nice example how it can work.
Thanks for your effort.
fly
___
Tagging
On 12/12/2014 13:13, Ulrich Lamm wrote:
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Tables_of_street_layouts
This could benefit from an explanation of what problem you're trying to
solve here. The wiki's full of "I think we should tag X like Y" pages
but without any arguments for a
It seems to be promoting cycleway=obligatory and similar tagging
conflicting
with existing usage of this case (cycleway=lane/opposite_lane/opposite/etc).
This is a good idea, but poorly executed - it needs a new, currently unused
key.
2014-12-12 14:13 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm :
>
> Hi,
>
> as an app
Folks,
Reading this threat, I think I agree with problems brought up around
amenity=fast_food
It's very subjective, and if you actually look at the DB, you see that
many times, people are mis-labeling fast food establishments as
restaurants. I see this with McDonalds, and Burger King, specificall
Hi,
as an approach for the development of a set of unequivocal tools for the
description of all kinds of road layouts,
I've made a large (though not conceise) list with graphics of the layouts and
their conventional and innovative taggings.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Tab
On Fri Dec 12 2014 04:49:56 GMT+ (GMT), John F. Eldredge wrote:
> I would not be surprised to find some establishments where the emphasis is on
> food up through mid-evening, but the kitchen closes earlier than the bar
> does, leaving the final hours of operation to offer only beverages and
