Re: [Tagging] Combining gas stations & convenience stores

> The best way is probably locals developping a tagging scheme for "their" > field. The only problem then would be cuisine types that don't exist in the > country of which they pretend to come from ;-) Yep - I’m sure the traditional, sushi, soba, udon, and maybe even the imported-from-china ra

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

working on a proposal for civic landuses, and a subtag for building=civic for all kinds of governmental buildings and services. Your input is appreciated. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic javbw > On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:30 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote: > >

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

On 12/15/2014 08:31 AM, Simone Savio wrote: Hi propose http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ufficio_pubblico becaus I want create a specific tag for public institutions in Italy such

Re: [Tagging] Watermill attributes

Coming back to city walls. Our walls in Padova are massive, were built mid 1500 and are still there. They are at present not tagged "historic" and hence don't show up on the history map. Thanks Volker for pointing us at that. The citywalls are tagged correctly. However there was a bug in our

Re: [Tagging] Moveable objects tagged as building=*

2014-12-12 1:59 GMT+01:00 715371 : > > I am wondering if the building-tag should be used for moveable objects. > I guess that this is not in the sense of the meaning of building (see > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building#Residential and check for > houseboats). > I believe that we shouldn't f

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

2014-12-15 17:03 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > 2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 : >> >> Hi, >> I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not >> need a custom tag for it >> > > > from my experience it is mostly not the amount of bureaucracy but the > response

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

Dmitry Kiselev wrote on 2014-12-15 14:52: I can't agree with you guys. All kinds of facilities where you can rent a bed for a night may be mapped as hotel with tons of sub-tags. But still we have hotels, motels, guest houses, and so on. [...] > We have restaurants and cafe, both offers you so

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 : > > Hi, > I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not > need a custom tag for it > from my experience it is mostly not the amount of bureaucracy but the response times that are a real show stopper ;-) > > http://wiki.openstr

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informagiovani does not look to me Italy-specific :-) On 15 December 2014 at 15:31, Simone Savio wrote: > > Hi propose > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ufficio_pubblico >

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

2014-12-15 15:52 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald : > > > > 2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 : >> >> I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not >> need a custom tag for it >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_building >> > > Why is this abandoned

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 : > > I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not > need a custom tag for it > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_building > Why is this abandoned? I just read the talk page, but it is not really clear to me

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

2014-12-15 15:31 GMT+01:00 Simone Savio : > > Hi propose > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ufficio_pubblico > > > becaus I want create a specific tag for public institutions in It

[Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

Hi propose http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ufficio_pubblico becaus I want create a specific tag for public institutions in Italy such as informagiovani because this concept does n

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

I can't agree with you guys. All kinds of facilities where you can rent a bed for a night may be mapped as hotel with tons of sub-tags. But still we have hotels, motels, guest houses, and so on. Even campings offers you some place to sleep and other stuff for money. All kinds of places where y

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

On 15/12/2014 12:31, Tom Pfeifer wrote: I don't see a need for a new key here. The properties can be easily modelled with sub-tagging of playground: +1 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com __

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-15 13:31 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer : > > I don't see a need for a new key here. > The properties can be easily modelled with sub-tagging of playground: Fully agree. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/l

[Tagging] lanes=x vs. xxx:lanes=a|b|c

Hi everyone, As I received a lot of questions lately, I want to point something out relating to the values of the lanes key and the number of lane-dependent values within any xxx:lanes key. * The number of lane-dependent values within any xxx:lanes key is equal to the number of lanes on the road,

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

I don't see a need for a new key here. The properties can be easily modelled with sub-tagging of playground: leisure=playground playground:supervised=yes/no playground:outdoor=yes/no playground:indoor=yes/no (btw, using "kids_area=both" in the older proposal is poor tagging since it is not s

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

Playgrounds are usually outdoor facilities, kids playing rooms and areas are usually not. Playgrounds almost newer are supervised by any kind of stuff. Kids areas and rooms, in most cases have employees who takes care of kids. Also there is different kind of activities for playgrounds and such

Re: [Tagging] Moveable objects tagged as building=*

One of the driving schools I went to is a permanent course laid out on a flood plain ( as is the soccer fields and helipads), but as it is inside a leveed flood canal, they are not allowed to build permanent buildings. So the driving school uses a bus. It has a desk, a waiting room, and everyt

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

Hi, The obvious question is: why not using leisure=playground? Since the definition in the first link you give says "an area where kids can play". Dan 2014-12-15 10:51 GMT+00:00 Dmitry Kiselev : > Hi > > We have > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amenity_features#kids_area.3Dno.2Findoor.2Foutd

[Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

Hi We have http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amenity_features#kids_area.3Dno.2Findoor.2Foutdoor.2Fboth for kids areas mappings. But sometimes kids area is an independant amenity. I think it would be nice to have amenity to map such features. So here is mine proposal for that http://wiki.op

Re: [Tagging] Combining gas stations & convenience stores

2014-12-15 8:00 GMT+01:00 johnw : > > PS:Basic categories of restaurants in Japan > > - Ramen, soba, udon > - cutlet > - Steak > - Italian > - Indian > - “Family” restaurant (denny’s, etc) > - Sushi / traditional Japanese > - Chinese > - takoyaki (octopus balls) > - karaage (Japanese style fried c

Re: [Tagging] Combining gas stations & convenience stores

2014-12-12 17:28 GMT+01:00 fly : > > Am 05.12.2014 um 21:30 schrieb Paul Johnson: > > How about site relations? Seems like a good use of a site relation. > > As long as it possible to draw the whole site as a single polygon, there > is no need of a site relation. > +1 unless you want to express