[Tagging] maxspeed=signals vs. maxspeed:variable=yes + maxspeed=x

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! As the usage of maxspeed:variable continues to increase, I would like to draw your attention again to its proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dynamic_maxspeed In my opinion maxspeed:variable is far superior to maxspeed=signals as it provides not only the

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Никита wrote:  leisure=playground playground:supervised=yes/no playground:outdoor=yes/no playground:indoor=yes/no kids_area=* is not about these 4 tags. kids_area=* is disjoint to leisure=playgrounds. Please read proposal.

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
Why not? Is your questions serious? Do you really want to tag 1000 pencils at 30 tables? Will you update this information from day to day? Will you separate playground:felt-tip pen=yes from playground:pen=yes? However, I think it was bad decision to have it tagged as playground=swing/etc instead

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
Let me highlight something that was said by you(!) in the email I answered to: Do you have tags forplayground=pony? playground=pencils? playground=books?  playground=table?  playground=horses? If not, there no reason to talk about it in kids_area proposal ...and then you proceed to talk

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 63, Issue 53

2014-12-19 Thread Ulrich Lamm
The principle yes vs. no vs. unrecorded is no total ban of default values. But if both, yes and no have a certain likelyhood, you mustn't use no as a default value. Toll is a good example: In a region without toll roads or on a type of roads that is always for free, you need not tag tool=no. In

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
This topic not about leisure=playground tagging. We need to define 2 ned tags: amenity=kids_area and kids_area=*. Please don't tell us about leisure=playground (it was mentioned in proposal that new tags will be opposite to leisure=playground) or amenity=recycling or recycling:*=* shema (WTF).

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-19 8:27 GMT+01:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com: kids_area=* is not about these 4 tags. kids_area=* is disjoint to leisure=playgrounds. Please read proposal. http://www.imenno.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/HD_08.jpg-940x626.jpg - leisure=playground

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-19 11:03 GMT+01:00 Ilpo Järvinen ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi: However, I think it was bad decision to have it tagged as playground=swing/etc +1, and it is also diverging from how tagging in OSM often works. Typically I'd expect from leisure=playground playground=foo to express that

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-19 12:06 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: how do you suggest to tag a kids_area? sorry, forget about this, I overlooked one of the links in the beginning... ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
IMO, kids_area=* is prefered when you have bigger feature: name=Joe pub amenity=pub kids_area=yes kids_area:fee=no or explicitly using: amenity=kids_area fee=no operator=Joe pub opening_hours=10-20 2014-12-19 15:06 GMT+04:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: 2014-12-19 8:27

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 63, Issue 53

2014-12-19 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Some weeks ago, there was a post in the forum by a mapper, who remembered that there was a cycletrack at a road he had used, but he had forgotten on which side. Furthermore, Opencyclemap renders cycleway=track but doesn't detect cycyleway:right=track. Therefore, some mappers don't tag the side

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-19 12:12 GMT+01:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com: IMO, kids_area=* is prefered when you have bigger feature: name=Joe pub amenity=pub kids_area=yes kids_area:fee=no or explicitly using: amenity=kids_area fee=no operator=Joe pub opening_hours=10-20 I think this tagging is

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
otherwise there would be useless overlap It is similar to hotel vs motels. Once you see good hotel you will filter out motels (hostels etc) from hotels. You don't want to classify motels. You want good hotels. We should put the focus on defining criteria for distinguishing these two. Ok, lets

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-19 13:07 GMT+01:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com: leisure=playground (usually outdoor), kids_area (almost always indoor, esp in Russia during winter) why can't we get rid of the exceptions (usually, almost always) and state that one is outdoors, the other indoors (if standalone), or one is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=public_bookcase

2014-12-19 Thread Janko Mihelić
-1 for amenity=reuse. Building=house can also be reused. This might be the most vague tag I've ever seen. Dana 18. 12. 2014. 14:55 osoba Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com napisala je: for reference, there have been discussions on this previously:

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
state that one is outdoors, the other indoors We speak for new tags now. I don't want to touch old tagging schema (leisure=playground) with over 200K+ uses, there will be even more people who don't see need in kids_area=*. not convinced. poor equipment is not my experience for some places, this

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=public_bookcase

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Vonwald
2014-12-19 13:30 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com: This might be the most vague tag I've ever seen. OT - just for a smile: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=building ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! 2014-12-19 13:17 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: 2014-12-19 13:07 GMT+01:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com: leisure=playground (usually outdoor), kids_area (almost always indoor, esp in Russia during winter) why can't we get rid of the exceptions (usually, almost always)

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-19 13:52 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com: I would prefer leisure=playground for standalone and kids_area=yes for an additional feature. This seems intuitive to me. +1, I'd see it the same. We could still have amenity=kids_area as well (for explicit mapping of the

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
-1, there is no reason to tag two identical playgrounds (outdoor, standard set of playground toys) differently just because one is near mall and other not. 2014-12-19 13:59 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: 2014-12-19 13:52 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com: I

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Vonwald
2014-12-19 13:59 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: I wouldn't add secondary criteria to the definition that is only sometimes or usually true. That's usually not a good idea, because sometimes a common motorway might also be some kind of runway for something similar to an

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Vonwald
2014-12-19 14:05 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com: -1, there is no reason to tag two identical playgrounds (outdoor, standard set of playground toys) differently just because one is near mall and other not. You are right. But we are not talking about near, we are talking

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
is near mall and other not. -1 to you. You failed to understand proposal/discussion. There a lot more differences beside simply indoor/outdoor criteria. Please read discussion from start. 2014-12-19 17:06 GMT+04:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com: 2014-12-19 13:59 GMT+01:00 Martin

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
we are talking about part of I think we can use this in definition, but lets wait for Dmitry. Here is my point: Definition: (required, must be tagged) kids_area=* - used for areas dedicated for kids within bigger facilities (restaurants, fast_foods, hotels, hospitals, airports, shops)

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread althio forum
On 19 December 2014 at 14:09, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com wrote: 2014-12-19 14:05 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com: -1, there is no reason to tag two identical playgrounds (outdoor, standard set of playground toys) differently just because one is near mall and other

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread ael
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:52:22PM +0100, Martin Vonwald wrote: I would prefer leisure=playground for standalone and kids_area=yes for an additional feature. This seems intuitive to me. Just a quick interjection from a native English speaker. Kids is slang. The proper English term is

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals vs. maxspeed:variable=yes + maxspeed=x

2014-12-19 Thread Volker Schmidt
* what is the maximum possible(!) speed limit The possible max speed limit is most likely the speed limit fo that type of road in that country, unless you have better information (from what source with what licence?), but that's not really helpful for a router * what is the reason(!) for the

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Philip Barnes
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 15:13 +, ael wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:52:22PM +0100, Martin Vonwald wrote: I would prefer leisure=playground for standalone and kids_area=yes for an additional feature. This seems intuitive to me. Just a quick interjection from a native English

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 19/12/2014, Никита acr...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, lets try: leisure=playground (usually outdoor), kids_area (almost always indoor, esp in Russia during winter) leisure=playground (poor equipment, often vandal resistant), kids_area (fragile or expensive equipment is not rare)

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
just tag the amenity with playground=yes. That doesn't work. We have a 20 km^2 airport. Will you really tag it with a 20 km^2 playground (child_area)? that I feel it's hopeless to try to tag it. For the same reason you prefer hotels over motels or hostels. There many differences but you

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 19/12/2014, Никита acr...@gmail.com wrote: Instead of 4 or 10 tags in OSM, real people use words: детская площадка (leisure=playground), детская игровая комната(kids_area=*) - this is much simpler and native way to map objects. This will work for short term, since we want to use kids_area.

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 19/12/2014, Никита acr...@gmail.com wrote: just tag the amenity with playground=yes. That doesn't work. We have a 20 km^2 airport. Will you really tag it with a 20 km^2 playground (child_area)? Tagging playground=yes on an amenity is just intended as a tagging shortcut (like atm=yes), but

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Никита
but of course you can map things more precisely. Exactly this was discussed. And I don't want to face the same quandary deciding between playground and children_area. I'm sorry for inconvenience, shall we remove several countries from OSM so you can easily use single tag you like to see?

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Philip Barnes
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 17:45 +0100, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: Trust me, there no overlap between: Детская площадка (leisure=playground) Игровая зона для детей (amenity=kids_area) The key criterias are wether it's indoor or outdoor and wether a fee is required. No need to introduce

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Tod Fitch
On Dec 19, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Philip Barnes wrote: And please make this childrens_area, kids is a slang word and is not appropriate in formal english, such as OSM tagging. Unless, of course, it is an area where young goats are kept. :) ___

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 19/12/2014, Никита acr...@gmail.com wrote: but of course you can map things more precisely. Exactly this was discussed. I was only arguing for using playground + subtags instead of playground vs children_area and noting that playground=yes could be added to the main amenity instead of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-19 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 18.12.2014 17:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: yes, legally it's Einheitsgemeinde, but that's maybe not a title... The Land has the title Stadtstaat, and of course it's also Bundeshauptstadt. Which one should go into admin_title and why? Have a look at Gemeinde Gutenbrunn:

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Steve Doerr
On 19/12/2014 15:13, ael wrote: Just a quick interjection from a native English speaker. Kids is slang. The proper English term is children. A kid is young goat. +1. I had been planning at some point to throw that particular spanner in the works. -- Steve --- This email has been checked

Re: [Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

2014-12-19 Thread Steve Doerr
On 19/12/2014 18:02, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: I was only arguing for using playground + subtags instead of playground vs children_area It's childrens_area, not children_area. In normal prose, it would be children's area (possessive, with an apostrophe). I think we generally accept the