[Tagging] pre-RFC: relation type=cluster/group

2015-01-06 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
I was going to write a proposal for relation type=cluster (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Cluster). Looking for real-world examples, I noticed that there's a relation type=group for the Great Lakes (id=1124369). What do you like better? type=group or type=cluster? --

Re: [Tagging] pre-RFC: relation type=cluster/group

2015-01-06 Thread Dan S
Hi - Does relation=site help? It sounds to me like a very similar concept: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Site Best Dan 2015-01-06 10:36 GMT+00:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at: I was going to write a proposal for relation type=cluster

Re: [Tagging] pre-RFC: relation type=cluster/group

2015-01-06 Thread Dan S
Oh, sorry, I see you mention it in the proposal. Still I don't see what would be bad about using site for the examples in your proposal, but I'll leave that there since you presumably feel differently. Dan 2015-01-06 10:18 GMT+00:00 Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com: Hi - Does relation=site

Re: [Tagging] landuse=religious and amenity=place of worship

2015-01-06 Thread Tom Pfeifer
A while ago I had identified the following use-cases / situations, which I now extend and my preferred tagging to them. Please note that the focus of amenity=place of worship should be on a ceremonial place, while landuse=religious can comprise auxiliary structures. Case 1 A building where

Re: [Tagging] barrier=net ?

2015-01-06 Thread Mike Thompson
I have been tagging the vertical netting at golf courses as barrier=fence In some cases there is more or less horizontal netting, and in that case I agree that barrier=fence does not fit. Mike On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:41 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote: There are 544 uses of barrier=net, and I

Re: [Tagging] landuse=religious and amenity=place of worship

2015-01-06 Thread johnw
On Jan 7, 2015, at 8:29 AM, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org wrote: A while ago I had identified the following use-cases / situations, which I now extend and my preferred tagging to them. +1 All sounds logical to me. Just a fountain at the mall, or car parking, or the building where

Re: [Tagging] barrier=net ?

2015-01-06 Thread John Willis
I think there is a big difference between a 5 story tall net (held up by massive poles) and a fence. If it was a 5 story tall fence or wall, we'd call it a building or a dam or something. These giant nets usually found near ballsports need their own tag - or maybe a new value of fence=net or

Re: [Tagging] barrier=net ?

2015-01-06 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 07.01.2015 02:43, John Willis wrote: I think there is a big difference between a 5 story tall net (held up by massive poles) and a fence. If it was a 5 story tall fence or wall, we'd call it a building or a dam or something. I would call it a fence or wall anyway. What is your minimum

Re: [Tagging] barrier=net ?

2015-01-06 Thread John Willis
What's the difference between an alley and a motorway besides width? Something about a giant flowing net 5 stores tall visible for kilometers away and a pice of netting used to hold a poodle in a yard seem similarly different, besides height. Javbw. On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Friedrich

Re: [Tagging] barrier=net ?

2015-01-06 Thread Andrew Harvey
I've also used it to tag nets in the water used to provide swimming areas safe from sharks. On 07/01/2015 11:42 am, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote: There are 544 uses of barrier=net, and I want to add it into the wiki. For many golf courses, driving ranges, and baseball fields world wide, and many