Re: [Tagging] Artist studio?

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 25.04.2015 um 02:04 schrieb johnw : > > > > there is no documented craft=artist (as in canvas creator), but there is > house painter. there is “sculptor" and "glaziery" so it looks as if > craft=artist sh

Re: [Tagging] proposal - camp_site= Voting on the 28th

OK, I think we have talked this topic just about to death. I propose to turn on voting on Tuesday, 28th April. So please, if you have some further improvements, get in now ! Thanks folks for all your help with this. Its been a great example of worrying away at a problem until its as good as it ca

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-GB] Wiki deprecation of an in-use feature

On 26/04/2015 6:09 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Lester Caine > wrote: Bryce ... you still have to make the case for 'special cases'. There is no reason to have two tags for many of these amenities. That's not the purpose I

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

On 25 April 2015 at 19:58, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > It's an amenity to me. +1 > And I've used them. +1 -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/list

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-GB] Wiki deprecation of an in-use feature

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > > Bryce ... you still have to make the case for 'special cases'. There is > no reason to have two tags for many of these amenities. That's not the purpose I started this thread for. "waterway=water_point" is in use. -- The issue of how to

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

> Am 24.04.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Tod Fitch : > > If some variation of the tagging described at > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site#Tagging_of_individual_pitches > is used the maybe camp_site:identifier=* could be used rather than ref=* or > addr:unit=*.

Re: [Tagging] Artist studio?

> Am 25.04.2015 um 02:04 schrieb johnw : > > there is no documented craft=artist (as in canvas creator), but there is > house painter. there is “sculptor" and "glaziery" so it looks as if > craft=artist should be created (mentioning that it is not for > sclupture/glass/photo based art) fr

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

It's an amenity to me. And I've used them. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

Amenity is definitely better. I used them more as a business traveller than as a tourist. On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:11 PM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Yes, that would be OK. > > On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 06:41:33 +0900 > John Willis wrote: > > > I think the meeting point has a name beyond "meeting poin

[Tagging] Wiki deprecation of an in-use feature

Here's what happened: 1. An in-use feature was documented on the wiki, but with a completely wrong description. 2. People used the bad definition worldwide. 3. The feature was marked deprecated on the wiki (without consulting the mappers using it correctly). 4. A blind mechanical

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

Yes, that would be OK. On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 06:41:33 +0900 John Willis wrote: > I think the meeting point has a name beyond "meeting point", so would > it be okay to name I of it has an actual name beyond its function > (even if it is "East meeting point" or "Exit C8 meeting point" if it > says t

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

> However, these meeting points are actually bogus. People do not care where > authorities want them to meet. People meet wherever they like. Even when > people meet at a designated meeting point by accident, they don't say: > "Let's meet at the meeting point." They say: "Let's meet in the lobby."

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

> Am 25.04.2015 um 10:27 schrieb Florian LAINEZ : > > tourism=meeting_point or amenity=meeting_point? There are also emergency=meeting_point as part of the fire precautions in some places. Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreet

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Criteria for taging as either via_ferrata or path

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:16:47AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2015-04-24 11:01 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. : > > > so are you happy that this > > > > http://www.bergsteigen.com/klettersteig/trentino-suedtirol/gardasee-berge/ferrata-rino-pisetta > > is tagged as highway=path ? > > > > > > I be

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

Hi, 2015-04-24 23:41 GMT+02:00 John Willis : > would it be okay to name I of it has an actual name beyond its function > (even if it is "East meeting point" or "Exit C8 meeting point" if it says > that on the sign? I guess yes, as far as it comes with the main tag. I have seen the place=* page

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

> Am 24.04.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt : > > You're right. That should just be: > place=meeting_point I don't like place as key here, because places are different kinds of places, the meeting point is a function, has not a name, is nothing besides being defined as meeting point c