2015-05-05 23:35 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
The core question is: should this be a top level tag:
leisure=camp_site
leisure=communal_activity_camp
leisure=caravan_site
Or subtags:
leisure=camp_site
caravans=dedicated
tents=yes
On 06/05/2015 03:54, David Bannon wrote:
Anyway, the issue is, perhaps confusion in some minds about =camp_site
and =caravan_site. Most (but not all) camp_sites will also take
caravans and RV's. But Tourism=caravan_site is for the caravan ONLY
type of place.
Here (in the UK) I'd
On Wed May 6 00:08:17 2015 GMT+0100, David Bannon wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover
camps organised for profit and by non-profits would be
leisure=vacation_camp.
I don't think
On Wed May 6 11:49:39 2015 GMT+0100, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
... very specific British connotations associated with
holiday_camp.
Yes, I would consider the british holiday camps would be better called
resorts (?). The permanent building being the clue.
-1
A resort is
On Wed May 6 08:23:34 2015 GMT+0100, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 06/05/2015 03:54, David Bannon wrote:
Anyway, the issue is, perhaps confusion in some minds about =camp_site
and =caravan_site. Most (but not all) camp_sites will also take
caravans and RV's. But Tourism=caravan_site is for the
2015-05-06 12:41 GMT+02:00 p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
One of the biggest issues I see is that the mapper has to choose between
tourism=caravan_site and tourism=campsite, when the vast majority of
commercial sites cater for both.
this is a non-issue, simply tag everything as tourism=camp_site
Lets be quite clear.
I am not talking about travellers, itinerant workers etc. That is a different
issue. Such places (trailer parks, mobile home parks, travellers sites etc.)
are a form of residential landuse.
Jerry
From: David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
To: Jerry Clough - OSM
There are several RV based camps in the mountains of San Diego that are large
camps with amenities, stores, fishing pond, and other things. Yes, there is
tent camping, but the major focus is the people staying (longer than a day) in
their RV and there is absolutely nothing whatsoever around
On 6 May 2015 at 17:41, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/05/2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
If people choose not to (or are not bothered to) comment, that's an
abstention.
Indeed, it may reasonably be argued that of they choose not to comment
on a
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 12:45 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
I am not talking about travellers, itinerant workers etc. That is a
different issue. Such places (trailer parks, mobile home parks,
travellers sites etc.) are a form of residential landuse.
Jerry, I suspect the distinction might be
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 11:09 +, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
A resort is usually a town whos primary purpose is tourism. A resort
is not operated by a single company, and access is not restricted.
Resort should probably be avoided due to totally different meanings
between BE and AE.
On 06/05/2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 6 May 2015 at 17:41, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/05/2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
If people choose not to (or are not bothered to) comment, that's an
abstention.
Indeed, it may
On 6 May 2015 at 17:41, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote:
It'd only be reasonable if those people were contacted. Discussions on
[tagging] or [talk] or the wiki are *not* a good way to contact
mappers for democratic opinion-gathering purposes. OSM doesn't have a
policy that
On 6 May 2015 at 20:40, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 06.05.2015 um 19:19 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
I know a few local tourism sites where the tourist brings only
themselves and rents a static caravan. How should they be tagged ?
if
On 05/05/2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
If people choose not to (or are not bothered to) comment, that's an
abstention.
Indeed, it may reasonably be argued that of they choose not to comment
on a proposal to do something, then they are content with the
proposal.
It'd
On 6 May 2015 at 11:46, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-06 12:41 GMT+02:00 p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
One of the biggest issues I see is that the mapper has to choose between
tourism=caravan_site and tourism=campsite, when the vast majority of
commercial sites cater
Am 06.05.2015 um 19:19 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
I know a few local tourism sites where the tourist brings only themselves and
rents a static caravan. How should they be tagged ?
if they're static I'd probably tag them like other huts you can rent for
vacation.
On 6 May 2015 at 10:56, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-05 23:35 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
The core question is: should this be a top level tag:
leisure=camp_site
leisure=communal_activity_camp
leisure=caravan_site
Or subtags:
The problem may relate in part to Germany, where a natural monument is a
thing.
Also in the USA the tag is ambiguous.
historic=memorial perhaps better fits the definition.
But even then there are many small memorials and roadside plaques that
could reasonably be tagged historic=memorial or
Dear all,
Openstreetmap-carto (the default rendering style on openstreetmap.org)
will soon render objects tagged historic=monument with an icon.
There is currently a large number of objects incorrectly tagged as
historic=monument.
The definition of historic=monument according to the wiki:
'A
Some of the parts about OSM seems to be in the spirit of the project,
although I would word some of it a bit differently.
To the extent possible I think we should focus on the positive and avoid
negative statements about other projects, or over generalizations about
those projects. For example
I call people to review the wiki page Why OSM and not another collaborative
mapping service?.
link:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_OSM_and_not_another_collaborative_mapping_service%3F
It was written by a single user as a generic page to compare other
collaborative mapping services to
I am using K-9, an open-source Android app.
On May 5, 2015 6:35:40 PM CDT, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:22 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
It has been many years since I last went tent-camping, but my
experience of campgrounds in the US national park
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 08:29:48PM -0600, Mike Thompson wrote:
To the extent possible I think we should focus on the positive and avoid
negative statements about other projects,
Why not, if they are true?
or over generalizations about
those projects. For example Your mapping service is a
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
That proposal has no listings for Australia (possibly www.
*nationaltrust*.org.au/ ?) and ignores British www.*nationaltrust*.
org.uk/ ?
I've no idea how the 'level' is decided .. while it gives some examples,
it does not
On 7/05/2015 3:18 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
That proposal has no listings for Australia (possibly
www.*nationaltrust*.org.au/ http://org.au/ ?) and ignores
British
There is confusion between monument and memorial ... suggest follow the
definitions under the OSM tag historic .. where
monument is large ... as in you can walk inside it, over it.
memorial is small .. say a plaque
I have re-tagged some of the 'monuments' to 'memorials' where I am
familiar
It's under Tagging, it's mentioned twice, once under Main tag, once
under Secondary tags
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/05/2015 3:18 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
That proposal has no
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:41 AM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 05/05/2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
Indeed, it may reasonably be argued that of they choose not to comment
on a proposal to do something, then they are content with the
proposal.
It'd
sorry I overlooked the same link in Matthijs email.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
They is a project+map that shows all those monuments with the request
to retag them: http://www.historic.place/themes/monuments/
regards
m.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at
They is a project+map that shows all those monuments with the request
to retag them: http://www.historic.place/themes/monuments/
regards
m.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
wrote:
Dear all,
Openstreetmap-carto (the default rendering style on
On May 6, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
The full expression of that might be the concept of a community of people who
edit things like I edit. If I start editing campgrounds for example,
perhaps the editor shows a chat window open to other people editing
32 matches
Mail list logo
