so this past week, i was at Disneyworld with my family. as it happens,
my wife is a civilian employee of the department of defense, so we
stayed at shades of green, a resort at Disney leased by the DoD for
use by service members, retirees and civilian employees.
for some reason, in OSM it has a
If there was a pilots club, it wouldn't be tagged as an airport.
The facilities my be designated for military personnel, but a) this is for
recreation - not a military funtcion, and b) it is merely leased lodging.
It's like is there was a bar near the base (not on base) for marines - it
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Eric Sibert courr...@eric.sibert.fr
wrote:
Overlapping should be the first step to mapping a dispute. Then if you want
to add dispute attributes, you could create a new multipolygon with areas
in question, and add dispute specific tags, wikidata tags, and
I think a good test case for testing if this can handle ongoing and complex
conflicts would be Kashmir, as it's currently five-ways disputed between
Pakistan, India, China, a Kashmir separatist/freedom/independence movement,
and recently displaced-from-Afghanistan irregular Islamic fundamentalist
Overlapping should be the first step to mapping a dispute. Then if you want
to add dispute attributes, you could create a new multipolygon with areas
in question, and add dispute specific tags, wikidata tags, and similar.
In my previous message, I proposed to create a relation for the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Eric Sibert courr...@eric.sibert.fr
wrote:
I think a good test case for testing if this can handle ongoing and complex
conflicts would be Kashmir, as it's currently five-ways disputed between
Pakistan, India, China, a Kashmir separatist/freedom/independence
uto, 21. srp 2015. u 01:33 moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com napisao
je:
How about:
* Map each boundary as that boundary's country sees it, allowing
overlaps. So the France boundary relation is according to France's
views, and vice-versa for Italy.
+1
Overlapping should be the first
sent from a phone
Am 22.07.2015 um 22:16 schrieb Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com:
Which means manual correction with inspection of aerial photos.
I agree on all but this sentence: you won't be able to actually inspect a
spot on aerial imagery, rather you should go there to understand
Yes, some disputed areas are more stable and, in osm, one may focuses
first on it.
In a lot of cases, there is de facto one country administrating the
area. We should use the de facto aspect to draw a closed
boundary=administrative.
Then we may add to the relation disputed areas with
@Eric: I looked at more examples, and I have to admit that you are right
with your statistical (0.1%) argument. Most cases I looked at, are obvious
accidental tagging errors.
I checked for Madagascar. I found one case and I'm the author :-p
I first added embankment and later cute a small part
@Martin: you are right there, naturally. I should have said You cannot do
this automatically with a mass edit. You need to consider each situation.
In many cases you may be able to understand the situation from satellite
photos (for example from shadows!) but there will be a large number where
you
11 matches
Mail list logo
