Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Reception/Reception_Point/Reception_Area

2015-07-27 Thread Warin
On 8/07/2015 9:47 AM, Warin wrote: Hi, These are all now open for voting. The 'winner' of these will be judged first on the greatest number of yes votes. Then the winner will be judged as per the normal proposal rules for rejected/approved. I think that is the best assessment of the

Re: [Tagging] landuse=military

2015-07-27 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Richard Welty wrote on 2015-07-26 20:04: the wiki definition for landuse=military is very broad: For land areas owned/used by the military for whatever purpose so the usage is correct if we strictly follow the wiki, but it still seems odd. which wiki page should that be?

Re: [Tagging] landuse=military

2015-07-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 27.07.2015 um 02:41 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com: Martin brought up that in some counties, the military is the police. Defining all the police stations as military facilities would equally be wrong. The actual situation is the other way round in Italy:

Re: [Tagging] landuse=military

2015-07-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 27.07.2015 um 02:51 schrieb Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net: i see that access=military has been discussed in the past (for roads) and dismissed, or i would suggest that. there's a difference between a road where all military has access to and a hotel where

Re: [Tagging] landuse=military

2015-07-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 27.07.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org: Consequently I agree that the dedicated holiday resort should not be tagged landuse=military as the land is not used for this purpose. recreation and entertainment of soldiers are genuine military uses,