Re: [Tagging] Orchards and their crops

> On Sep 15, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote: > > Hi John, > > No there is nothing I'm aware of which discriminates anywhere between > cultivated pears in general (Pyrus communis) & specific cultivars > ('Conference'

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

Mateusz Konieczny wrote (and others said similarly): > I would use "theme". That's great. 'theme=bicycle' it is then. Nice (and rare) to get consensus so quickly! Thanks all. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Cycle-cafes-tp5854712p5854737.html Sent

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

sent from a phone > Am 15.09.2015 um 02:12 schrieb Dave Swarthout : > > There is at present a cafe:style tag with only 5 uses in Taginfo. A better > choice? I don't know. I also thought initially about prefixing cafe like cafe:style and cafe_style (or theme), but

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

Do we update the playground scheme ? the wiki page mentions playground:theme. On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > Am 15.09.2015 um 02:12 schrieb Dave Swarthout : > > There is at present a

Re: [Tagging] Orchards and their crops

Javbw > On Sep 15, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote: > > our next problem is to identify the cultivars: not easy with cherries in > Japan. So there is nothing between "This is a pear" And "This is the very specific cultivar of this variety of this pear. ?

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:18:27 +0100 Lester Caine wrote: > On 15/09/15 08:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> If it wasn't clear already, railway=dismantled, end_date, or any > >> > system that mixes past and present in the same namespace is IMHO > >> > not acceptable. > > > >

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 05:25:16 +0200 Marc Gemis wrote: > For playground the wiki suggests: playground:theme [1]. That would > mean we should use cafe:theme. > Or could we drop the "playground:" and go for "theme" everywhere ? > > [1]

Re: [Tagging] Handle with care (was: Accuracy of survey)

Friday 11 September 2015 19:16:09, André Pirard: > But JOSM says "The server responds with the return code 404 instead of 200. " > when trying to validate http://dev.openstreetmap.org/ as well as > http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ > Thanks, but please give correct information. Hi André The

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

sent from a phone > Am 15.09.2015 um 10:56 schrieb Marc Gemis : > > Do we update the playground scheme ? the wiki page mentions playground:theme. IMHO not, but we could ;-) currently just 45 uses there is also naturebase:theme:

Re: [Tagging] Orchards and their crops

Hi John, This is pretty much the type of situation which the taxon tag is meant to cope with: current tagging says it's an apple orchard, with taxon we can show that it's one for Bramley's or the cider apples loved by RichardF. "taxon=Malus domestica 'Bramley's Seedling'" This can be used

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

W dniu 15.09.2015 10:57, Mateusz Konieczny napisał(a): I would go with the everywhere - easier to tag and use. +1. For example theme=* key would be especially useful for tourism=theme_park. =} -- "The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags down" [A. Cohen]

Re: [Tagging] Orchards and their crops

Hi John, No there is nothing I'm aware of which discriminates anywhere between cultivated pears in general (Pyrus communis) & specific cultivars ('Conference'). Cultivar just is shorthand for "cultivated variety" so of course there is no hierarchy variety=>cultivar. That's just the way

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:25:41 +0200 Tom Pfeifer wrote: > So if our railway enthusiasts look for locomotive themed locations, > they would not necessarily want to be shown playground locomotives. Some would want to find also that. Excluding leisure=playground is far easier

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

2015-09-15 12:17 GMT+02:00 Jo : > What about an indoor playground in a café? I can think of an examplen in > Aarschot, Belgium (Bekaf), but OK, neither the playground nor the cafe are > going with a theme. The question is, what if they had and both themes were > different?

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

It's an indoor playground which forms an integral part of the café. Could always be mapped as a node inside the building contour, I guess. Jo 2015-09-15 13:27 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2015-09-15 12:17 GMT+02:00 Jo : > >> What about an

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

W dniu 15.09.2015 16:01, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a): 2015-09-15 15:56 GMT+02:00 John Willis : A lot of theme parks are tied to their brand (disney), so places with a very obvious theme might just be their brand. still they have subsections (like scifi EPCOT if I recall

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

I have no idea about this, but are there ways to tag zones in a theme park? Trying to discern themes might be really difficult without a good list of beginning themes. Westernland and tomorrowland, etc, for example. Is that cowboy and astronaut? The old west? Retro space? Pioneer times?

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

What about an indoor playground in a café? I can think of an examplen in Aarschot, Belgium (Bekaf), but OK, neither the playground nor the cafe are going with a theme. The question is, what if they had and both themes were different? I would stick with playground:theme. It's nice and clear. The

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

2015-09-15 14:25 GMT+02:00 Tom Pfeifer : > The idea for playground:theme=* came up when johnw was looking for > labelling > octopus-themed playgrounds in Japan (though he has not applied it yet). > > Thus, while I am happy with theme=* for the cafe example, I'd prefer to >

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

> On Sep 15, 2015, at 9:25 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > , they would not > necessarily want to be shown playground locomotives. > > The idea for playground:theme=* came up when johnw was looking for labelling > octopus-themed playgrounds in Japan (though he has not

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

2015-09-15 15:56 GMT+02:00 John Willis : > A lot of theme parks are tied to their brand (disney), so places with a > very obvious theme might just be their brand. still they have subsections (like scifi EPCOT if I recall right) Cheers, Martin

Re: [Tagging] Modelling the relation between a waterstream and one of its resurgence

> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:18:37 +0200 > From: ricoz@gmail.com > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Modelling the relation between a waterstream and one > of its resurgence > missing data should not prevent the mapping of known good data. If it has > been established

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

2015-09-15 16:06 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć : > So maybe theme=multi for the whole area? I would tag the subareas with their respective theme tag and either don't care for the whole or use something like the suggested theme=disney. "multi" is mostly useless, as you don't know what it

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

Please consider that a playground often creates a 'parallel universe', that only mimics the 'real world'. So if our railway enthusiasts look for locomotive themed locations, they would not necessarily want to be shown playground locomotives. The idea for playground:theme=* came up when johnw

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

W dniu 15.09.2015 16:09, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a): I would tag the subareas with their respective theme tag and either don't care for the whole or use something like the suggested theme=disney. "multi" is mostly useless, as you don't know what it stands for. I would use "disney"* as a

Re: [Tagging] Cycle cafes

2015-09-15 16:29 GMT+02:00 John Willis : > I have no idea about this, but are there ways to tag zones in a theme park? > > Trying to discern themes might be really difficult without a good list of > beginning themes. > > Westernland and tomorrowland, etc, for example. > > Is that