[Tagging] Xxzme edit of wiki proposed features page voting

With no discussion on the relevant talk page .. This page has been labelled for deletion. As I use this page to check for any new proposals up for voting it forms an essential part of my voting on new proposals. Are there any who support the deletion of this page?

Re: [Tagging] Semi-detached houses: undocumented iD preset

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > it depends how you use the word "Doppelhaus". Legally it means 2 touching > houses on 2 parcels. Architectonically it means 2 more or less symmetric > buildings that touch. They don't have to share the same

Re: [Tagging] Semi-detached houses: undocumented iD preset

sent from a phone > Am 18.09.2015 um 07:33 schrieb Colin Smale : > > Can we assume the houses at the ends of terraces are to be tagged as semi > detached? My dictionary believes those are called "end-terrace_house" (in German "Reihenendhaus"), while the semidetached

Re: [Tagging] Xxzme edit of wiki proposed features page voting

What page exactly? On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > With no discussion on the relevant talk page .. > > This page has been labelled for deletion. > > As I use this page to check for any new proposals up for voting it forms > an essential part of my voting

Re: [Tagging] Semi-detached houses: undocumented iD preset

sent from a phone > Am 18.09.2015 um 10:00 schrieb Ruben Maes : > > None of those values are OK, but iD wants us to embrace semidetached_house? I believe to recall that this value was discussed at least on the German mailing list, I don't perceive it as pushed by iD.

Re: [Tagging] Semi-detached houses: undocumented iD preset

sent from a phone > Am 18.09.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Ruben Maes : > > Doppelhäuser which is not exactly the same as just two houses that share a > wall, right? it depends how you use the word "Doppelhaus". Legally it means 2 touching houses on 2 parcels.

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - aeroway=heliport (was: Re: Heliport tagging)

W dniu 03.09.2015 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny napisał(a): Using different tagging for heliports and airports supporting planes seems to be a good idea. So here is my quick draft documenting aeroway=heliport scheme: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/aeroway%3Dheliport

Re: [Tagging] Semi-detached houses: undocumented iD preset

sent from a phone > Am 18.09.2015 um 09:47 schrieb Frederik Ramm : > > I'd say the same applies to houses. Whether something is one half of a > double house, or semi-detached, or terraced, or free-standing - isn't > that something that I can automatically determine by

Re: [Tagging] Semi-detached houses: undocumented iD preset

Thursday 17 September 2015 16:48:48, Martin Koppenhoefer: > > sent from a phone > > > Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes : > > > > building:type=semidetached_house, > > is ok for me. We should write a definition into the wiki, thank you for > preparing a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - aeroway=heliport (was: Re: Heliport tagging)

It's not all that clear to me. Are you proposing the tag aeroway=heliport to be used in the specific case of a helipad that is part of a regular airport instead of using aeroway=helipad? If so, do you recommend we continue using the helipad tagging in the case of a separate facility for

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - aeroway=heliport

W dniu 18.09.2015 15:31, Dave Swarthout napisał(a): It's not all that clear to me. Are you proposing the tag aeroway=heliport to be used in the specific case of a helipad that is part of a regular airport instead of using aeroway=helipad? If so, do you recommend we continue using the helipad

Re: [Tagging] Semi-detached houses: undocumented iD preset

On 18/09/2015, Frederik Ramm wrote: > I'd say the same applies to houses. Whether something is one half of a > double house, or semi-detached, or terraced, or free-standing - isn't > that something that I can automatically determine by looking at the > nearby mapped