Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

2015-12-01 Thread Dudley Ibbett
landuse=flowerbed already exists in the wiki. Personally I would just use this but if another tag is to be developed one consideration with regard to using an "landuse" tag is, should it be more widely applicable? "landuse=ornamental_planting" for example with another tag to describe the type

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Level:ref=*

2015-12-01 Thread Simon Poole
Am 30.11.2015 um 10:26 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > 2015-11-29 22:05 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole >: > > I would rather be looking for something that fits in with SIT > (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging) better. > > > > I don't

Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

2015-12-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-12-01 8:15 GMT+01:00 Dudley Ibbett : > In the context you are describing (park, garden) these would be > "landuse=flowerbed". There is no size restriction. I.e. They may look > like an "open field". There appears to be a wiki entry for this tag > already. > > If

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bicycle_repair_station

2015-12-01 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Andy Townsend wrote: > > My first thought is that even fewer people will understand what this is > than understand what a "bicycle repair station" is. As I said back in >

Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

2015-12-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-12-01 9:02 GMT+01:00 John Willis : > So landuse=ornamental_flowers is the current value I will propose, as it > has no size connotations yes, it has no size connotations, but it is about "ornament"? Or am I misreading this? You keep speaking of "flower fields", so I think

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

2015-12-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-12-01 5:18 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > Better might be: nodes (the node should be placed in the centre of the > area occupied by the adoption agency) you can also use an area instead of the node. An area has certain advantages (says something about the size, can contain

Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

2015-12-01 Thread John Willis
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Dudley Ibbett wrote: > > landuse=flowerbed To me, flowerbed has connotations of a little area beside a house. I also think purpose should be there (to avoid the farm/farmyard issue), So landuse=ornamental_flowers is the current value

Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

2015-12-01 Thread johnw
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > 2015-12-01 9:02 GMT+01:00 John Willis >: > So landuse=ornamental_flowers is the current value I will propose, as it has > no size connotations > > > yes, it has no

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

2015-12-01 Thread Dominic Coletti
> > it is not about legal dependency or guardianship, but rather about titles > and inheritance rights. Wikipedia has a short article on it: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_adoption > ​That is correct, but note that there are no adoption agencies for adults, it is predominately handled in

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

2015-12-01 Thread Dominic Coletti
> > Better might be: nodes (the node should be placed in the centre of the > area occupied by the adoption agency) > ​Better might be: "Definition: A place where prospective parent/s may adopt > a child or children" > ​​ Both fixed.​ [image: CAP Banner] *C/TSgt Dominic Coletti, CAP*Cadet

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

2015-12-01 Thread Dominic Coletti
> > you can also use an area instead of the node. An area has certain > advantages (says something about the size, can contain further objects like > areas and nodes) and some disadvantages (more work to draw, more complex to > edit) and requires more information (an idea about the extent of the

[Tagging] Fwd: Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

2015-12-01 Thread John Willis
Accidentally sent just to Marc Javbw Begin forwarded message: > From: johnw > Date: December 1, 2015 at 8:42:17 PM GMT+9 > To: Marc Gemis > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?) > > >> On Dec 1, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Marc Gemis

Re: [Tagging] Road Running Railways

2015-12-01 Thread Paul Johnson
Nope, that's it. Center the line between the rails for the railway. Optional: landuse=highway for the ROW of the road. On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Dominic Coletti wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed that there is no set tag for rails that are embedded within >