Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] If a school is a shelter when a disaster happens...

sent from a phone > Am 30.12.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Dongpo Deng : > > That is, we cannot simultaneously use amenity = school and amenity = > social_facility; social_facility = shelter for a school with shelter > functionality. besides the precise tagging (social

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] If a school is a shelter when a disaster happens...

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > besides the precise tagging (social facility or emergency), I just want to > point out that you can have 2 main tags for the same area (overlapping), > just not on the same object. > You could for instance

Re: [Tagging] Specifying maxweight, when different weight limits are signed

sent from a phone > Am 30.12.2015 um 19:58 schrieb Marcos Oliveira > : > > Do you know if this is a legal limit or if being smaller makes the weight > less spread out which can structurally damage the bridge? that's always legal limits, structurally it will

Re: [Tagging] Specifying maxweight, when different weight limits are signed

Looking at the photo in the original post, it looks like the categories are a bit more specific than "hgv" - possibly articulated/semitrailers vs. drawbar trailers, possibly based on the number of axles. What is the proper/legal defintion of the vehicle categories that the symbols represent?

Re: [Tagging] Specifying maxweight, when different weight limits are signed

On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 14:58 +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > Philip Barnes wrote on 2015/12/31 14:44: > > > > They all seem to apply to hgv, but to me it looks like an axle > > weight > > limit of just over 6t, but signed in a very odd way. > > > > 13 / 2 = 6.5 > > 19 / 3 = 6. > > 25 / 4 = 6.25 >

Re: [Tagging] Specifying maxweight, when different weight limits are signed

sent from a phone > Am 30.12.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Jack Burke : > > What's the right way to specify maxweight when the weight limit sign has > different values for different vehicles? Just use the highest value shown? you should specify the maxweight for all vehicles

Re: [Tagging] Specifying maxweight, when different weight limits are signed

On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 14:30 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > > > Am 30.12.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Jack Burke : > > > > What's the right way to specify maxweight when the weight limit > > sign has different values for different vehicles?  Just use the >

Re: [Tagging] Specifying maxweight, when different weight limits are signed

The Florida Trucking Manual [1] (page 10) explains the categories thus: _The maximum allowable weight is listed in tons beside the silhouette for each of the three classes of vehicles._ _The SINGLE-UNIT TRUCK silhouette includes all straight trucks, cranes, and other single-unit special mobile

[Tagging] Template:KeyDescription - implies vs. requires

I just stumbled over the KeyDescription array in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility which says: " Implies amenity=social_facility " while the tagging instructions and examples all say to explicitly use amenity=social_facility + social_facility=* This was on the page

Re: [Tagging] Specifying maxweight, when different weight limits are signed

Philip Barnes wrote on 2015/12/31 14:44: They all seem to apply to hgv, but to me it looks like an axle weight limit of just over 6t, but signed in a very odd way. 13 / 2 = 6.5 19 / 3 = 6. 25 / 4 = 6.25 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxaxleload I would take the worst case and

[Tagging] tank barrier

how do you tag this barrier: https://www.flickr.com/photos/zaruka/2945111565 there are also types that are just pillars on the side of the road that are loaded with explosives and fall on the street to block it. ___ Tagging mailing list