Re: [Tagging] importance=* tag (for transportation etc)

2016-03-22 Thread Janko Mihelić
Elements with only one or two wikipedia articles should probably ignore their "wikipedia weight". There is always some group of enthusiasts that will make articles about anything. But only in their own language and maybe one more. My croatian wikipedia has articles about hundreds of grass hockey p

Re: [Tagging] importance=* tag (for transportation etc)

2016-03-22 Thread Philip Barnes
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 20:27 +0100, Alexander Matheisen wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 22.03.2016, 17:41 + schrieb Philip Barnes: > > > >   > > Every railway station seems to have a wikipedia page, even if is > > says > > no more than can be deduced by looking at it on OSM. > No, only some important

Re: [Tagging] importance=* tag (for transportation etc)

2016-03-22 Thread Alexander Matheisen
Am Dienstag, den 22.03.2016, 17:41 + schrieb Philip Barnes: > On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 16:29 +, Janko Mihelić wrote: > > pon, 21. ožu 2016. u 23:28 Daniel Koć napisao je: > > > > > > Almost 5 months of discussing and hand tweaking the algorithm > > > tells > > > me > > > just having the hard

Re: [Tagging] importance=* tag (for transportation etc)

2016-03-22 Thread Mike Thompson
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Koć wrote: > > > > > Still I think "international airport" in the name hints us something and > is worth using this way or another to indicate importance. > International/domestic/local fares are rather useful and popular > description of importance level f

Re: [Tagging] importance=* tag (for transportation etc)

2016-03-22 Thread Philip Barnes
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 16:29 +, Janko Mihelić wrote: > pon, 21. ožu 2016. u 23:28 Daniel Koć napisao je: > > > > Almost 5 months of discussing and hand tweaking the algorithm tells > > me > > just having the hard (numerical) data might be not as easy as you > > depict > > it. Raw population da

Re: [Tagging] importance=* tag (for transportation etc)

2016-03-22 Thread Janko Mihelić
pon, 21. ožu 2016. u 23:28 Daniel Koć napisao je: > > Almost 5 months of discussing and hand tweaking the algorithm tells me > just having the hard (numerical) data might be not as easy as you depict > it. Raw population data is far from having world-range city ranking we > needed. > I wasn't ta

Re: [Tagging] importance=* tag (for transportation etc)

2016-03-22 Thread Janko Mihelić
pon, 21. ožu 2016. u 23:38 johnw napisao je: > > this might be a good solution for ordering the mountains at a national or > international level. > > but It doesn’t work very well (probably at all) for provincial level, > unless all mountains except for the ones on the wikidata get rendered in at