Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Hans De Kryger
On Jul 10, 2016 11:28 PM, "Jo" wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > The semantics depend on public_transport:version. > > If 1 then yes. > If 2 there should be no forward/backward roles anymore. > > Instead you add an ordered sequence of ways that is continuous. > > If you want a demo of

Re: [Tagging] adding sport detail to sport=multi using sport=x; multi

2016-07-11 Thread Warin
On 7/12/2016 8:12 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Il giorno 12 lug 2016, alle ore 00:04, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: I tag sports that have some infrastructure on the ground .. thus I don't use sport=multi but rather the actual sport that has some

Re: [Tagging] adding sport detail to sport=multi using sport=x; multi

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 12 lug 2016, alle ore 00:04, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > I tag sports that have some infrastructure on the ground .. thus I don't use > sport=multi but rather the actual sport that has some markings/goal post that > are present. like any

Re: [Tagging] adding sport detail to sport=multi using sport=x; multi

2016-07-11 Thread Warin
On 7/12/2016 7:47 AM, John Willis wrote: On Jul 11, 2016, at 6:35 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: sport=multi sport:rugby=no sport:american_football=no Sounds good! I tag sports that have some infrastructure on the ground .. thus I don't use sport=multi but rather the

Re: [Tagging] adding sport detail to sport=multi using sport=x; multi

2016-07-11 Thread John Willis
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 6:35 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > sport=multi > sport:rugby=no > sport:american_football=no > Sounds good! > and maybe even > > pitch:turf=fragile The field is standard grass pitch- they just don't accept the eventual damage that American

Re: [Tagging] amenity=retirement_home and social facility

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 11 lug 2016, alle ore 15:09, Greg Troxel ha > scritto: > > My real point is that "group home" is a loaded term, and using it as a > tag where it goes beyond the US usage is likely to cause problems. +1, also for me (with no knowledge about the

Re: [Tagging] amenity=retirement_home and social facility

2016-07-11 Thread Greg Troxel
Tom Pfeifer writes: > Greg Troxel wrote on 2016/07/02 01:08: > >> Almost no one moves to a "group home" because of age-related mobility or >> cognitive issues. > > Hm, maybe that is not so visible as a facility, but certainly lots of fitter > seniors join to share a

Re: [Tagging] adding sport detail to sport=multi using sport=x; multi

2016-07-11 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 18:31 +0900, John Willis wrote: > Sometimes a pitch is defined by what is not allowed. > Most sports pitches in Japan, where you would find soccer or other > grass-field sports, often don't allow rugby or American football > because of the damage to the turf. It would be

Re: [Tagging] adding sport detail to sport=multi using sport=x; multi

2016-07-11 Thread John Willis
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > I admit I have never been a big fan of sport=multi because this is not very > useful information if you are looking for something specific. Sounds great, and long as there is a "free" value. I can think

Re: [Tagging] adding sport detail to sport=multi using sport=x; multi

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 11 lug 2016, alle ore 01:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > for example 'sport=soccer;multi' form a pitch visibly soccer from the imagery > and previously tagged 'sport=multi' I admit I have never been a big fan of sport=multi because this is

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 11 lug 2016, alle ore 08:26, Jo ha scritto: > > If 1 then yes. > If 2 there should be no forward/backward roles anymore. > > Instead you add an ordered sequence of ways that is continuous. +1, around here we've made good experiences with

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 11 lug 2016, alle ore 09:32, Jo ha scritto: > > Since life is too short If you see it as a generational project this becomes less of an issue, we're building for our kids ;-) cheers, Martin ___

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Jo
Hi Hans, Yes, that describes version 2. It's the currently used version, so version 1 route relations should be converted to several version 2 route relations, one for each variant of the line. There are a few things I don't agree with on that wiki page, like including all the stop_positions to

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Hans De Kryger
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport#Route Is version 2? *Regards,* *Hans* On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Hans De Kryger wrote: > Thanks Jo, > > Is there agreement on the forward/backward roles in PT2? By that i mean >

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Hans De Kryger
Thanks Jo, Is there agreement on the forward/backward roles in PT2? By that i mean completely phasing them out. Or is it still an open discussion?‚Äč I won't add them anymore if the point is to phase them out. *Regards,* *Hans* On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Jo wrote: >

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Jo
Hi Hans, The semantics depend on public_transport:version. If 1 then yes. If 2 there should be no forward/backward roles anymore. Instead you add an ordered sequence of ways that is continuous. If you want a demo of how to map PT, we can do a hangout. Also, have a look at this:

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Colin Smale
...unless the way is tagged oneway=yes, in which case forward/backward is redundant On 2016-07-11 08:08, Hans De Kryger wrote: > If i remove the forward/backward tag on a section of a way (part of the bus > route) does that signify the bus goes both ways? > > REGARDS, > HANS >

[Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-11 Thread Hans De Kryger
If i remove the forward/backward tag on a section of a way (part of the bus route) does that signify the bus goes both ways? *Regards,* *Hans* ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging