On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:34 PM, David Bannon
wrote:
> Might be worth your while looking at how others are using the data, OsmAnd
> do a great job of rendering some of the detail found in the database. And
> make a pretty attractive looking map at the same time. There are lots of
> other 'consum
On 27/07/16 12:59, Kevin Kenny wrote:
.
How about we make a deal that when the "correct" tagging actually
becomes visible on at least one layer of the main site, I go back and
remove the "legacy" tagging, which can be done with a mechanical edit?
Kevin, I share your frustration but sugge
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/27/2016 5:11 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
>> But all right. I'll settle for either "landuse=forest" or
>> "leisure=nature_reserve" as something that at least does not misrender
>> horribly, and note that such tagging is retai
On 7/27/2016 5:11 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
The immediate question: I have the boundary multipolygon for a large
state park. The park has several stretches of waterfront. In some
places the boundary of the park follows the high tide line. In others,
it's set back from the shore (and the waterfront
The immediate question: I have the boundary multipolygon for a large state
park. The park has several stretches of waterfront. In some places the
boundary of the park follows the high tide line. In others, it's set back
from the shore (and the waterfront may have another owner). And in other
cases
