Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

2016-10-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 04 ott 2016, alle ore 21:11, Michael Reichert ha > scritto: > > A relation with type=railway + railway=operating_site could connect the > station node and the area of the station (landuse=railway polygon). what's the point of mapping the station tags on a node,

Re: [Tagging] mapping default values? (was: Maximum snelheid in Vlaanderen, maxspeed in Flanders)

2016-10-04 Thread André Pirard
On 2016-09-27 11:43, Marc Gemis wrote: > Hallo, > > op 1/1/2017 daalt de snelheid op Vlaamse gewestwegen van 90 naar 70. > Normaal gezien zullen we die wegen (zonder expliciete borden) dan > moeten taggen met > > maxspeed=70 > source:maxspeed=??:rural > > maar wat komt er op de plaats van de vraagt

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

2016-10-04 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, Am 2016-10-04 um 11:37 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > 2016-10-03 21:54 GMT+02:00 Alexander Matheisen > : > >> The main problem I see for mapping stations as areas is the lack >> of defined boundaries. Compared to other types of POIs, the >> definition of a "station area" strongly differs depe

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

2016-10-04 Thread Michael Reichert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Am 2016-10-04 um 11:50 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > 2016-10-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > >> There is a nice diagram of how to map a simple station >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation#A_S >> i

Re: [Tagging] Capital=* and admin_level on cities

2016-10-04 Thread Joachim
Wikipedia[1] tends to agree with you. So we need another role=capital which just means capital plus administrative centre and capital only when in addition role admin_centre is used? For lower entities (below admin_level=4) the word "capital" seems to be not used much, so admin_centre should suffic

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

2016-10-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-10-04 12:32 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > This would conflict with the use of railway=station as an area ... > The same tag could be used for all 'stations' (train, bus etc)??? > the railway=station tag is for train and lightrail and subway stations. It is not for bus terminals

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

2016-10-04 Thread Warin
On 04-Oct-16 08:50 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2016-10-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com >: There is a nice diagram of how to map a simple station http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation#A_Simple_Railway_Station

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

2016-10-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-10-04 0:19 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > There is a nice diagram of how to map a simple station > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation#A_S > imple_Railway_Station > I believe this diagram is completely wrong regarding the station area and landuse. I sugges

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

2016-10-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-10-03 21:58 GMT+02:00 Alexander Matheisen : > I do not think you should change the definitions without any longer > discussion. > that's why I have put this back to 2015 when it was changed and areas were marked as "invalid" (10% of all stations btw.). > And using no change comment for

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

2016-10-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-10-03 21:54 GMT+02:00 Alexander Matheisen : > The main problem I see for mapping stations as areas is the lack of > defined boundaries. Compared to other types of POIs, the definition of > a "station area" strongly differs depending on the background of the > mapper and the use case. > most