I definitely think it's a matter of permission and opening hours, the polygon
where this permission apply is secondary, could it be an admin boundary or
reserve of some kind.
Let the case where no boundary exists yet in OSM, then map it.
Yves
Le 21 octobre 2016 15:45:26 GMT+02:00, Kevin Ke
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Craig Wallace wrote:
>
>
> But that is different from an area is managed primarily to benefit
> hunting. eg if they are keeping deer numbers artificially high (feeding
> over winter, or breeding), just to allow as many as possible to be shot.
> Despite the damage t
That's rather a simplistic view. Hunting reserves exist to protect the
land from development so that there will be places where it is possible to
hunt and game available to harvest. The important distinction isn't the one
between 'hunting reserve' and 'wilderness'; it's the one between 'reserve
la
On 2016-10-21 14:07, Greg Troxel wrote:
Craig Wallace writes:
I think this is wrong. A nature reserve an area to protect wildlife,
not to allow it to be shot. A nature reserve is managed for the
purposes of conservation. So if an area is primarily for hunting, it
is not a nature reserve.
I
Craig Wallace writes:
> I think this is wrong. A nature reserve an area to protect wildlife,
> not to allow it to be shot. A nature reserve is managed for the
> purposes of conservation. So if an area is primarily for hunting, it
> is not a nature reserve.
I think you are off here. Nature is c
On 2016-10-20 16:33, Kevin Kenny wrote:
Since nobody else has stepped forward to answer this, as far as I can
tell, let me take a whack at it:
I think that the best tagging for a hunting reserve that the current
renderer knows about is 'leisure=nature_reserve". That's how the state
wildlife mana
