Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

2016-11-28 Thread Bill Ricker
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > What I am after is a higher fidelity solution that also goes beyond > 'seasonality'. What do you think? ​your proposal for a alarm-time on a fixme - for which a small bit of programming could cause a Note to appear when

Re: [Tagging] Key:visibility

2016-11-28 Thread markus schnalke
[2016-11-28 20:50] Paul Desgranges > > Visibility and readability are not the same, [...] They also suggest different meanings, at least to me. When I first read you message about visibility of public clocks, I thought it would indicate from which directions or places

Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

2016-11-28 Thread John Willis
Javbw > On 29 Nov 2016, at 4:29 AM, Tod Fitch wrote: > > A number of state highway routes through the Sierra Nevada are closed in > winter. The rub is, the real closure is from first significant snowfall until > it either melts or they bring in the rotary plows in

Re: [Tagging] Key:visibility

2016-11-28 Thread Paul Desgranges
I just wanted to extend the meaning of 'visibility' so that it does not match only the 'clocks' but more things and for example 'advertising' devices. As a matter of fact, I find as well that "house"/"street"/"area" are not very well understandable values for "visibility", but its was the

Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

2016-11-28 Thread Tod Fitch
> On Nov 28, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > Bill, > > The seasonal tag[1] already exists for very general 'seasonal availability' > of features. This works for a very rough approximation of actual > availability which may be enough for some use cases. This

Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

2016-11-28 Thread Michał Brzozowski
remonty.openstreetmap.pl/remonty does exactly that for Poland. It's used mainly by paid mappers from Yanosik who get info from their app. IIRC it issues a note whenever an opening is due. Michał 28.11.2016 18:54 "Martijn van Exel" napisał(a): > Hi, > > When mapping seasonal

Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

2016-11-28 Thread Martijn van Exel
Bill, The seasonal tag[1] already exists for very general 'seasonal availability' of features. This works for a very rough approximation of actual availability which may be enough for some use cases. This could (should?) be used as a fallback. What I am after is a higher fidelity solution that

Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

2016-11-28 Thread Martijn van Exel
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44013342 for a tagging example. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi, > > When mapping seasonal closures here in Utah[1] I realized I am still > missing a solid way

Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

2016-11-28 Thread Bill Ricker
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi, > > When mapping seasonal closures here in Utah[1] I realized I am still > missing a solid way to mark a road as closed for the season and then have > some level of confidence that someone will look at it in the

[Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

2016-11-28 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi, When mapping seasonal closures here in Utah[1] I realized I am still missing a solid way to mark a road as closed for the season and then have some level of confidence that someone will look at it in the spring and 'reopen' it. More generally for someone to map a feature and somehow tag it as

Re: [Tagging] highway=primary/secondary/tertiary - tag according to quality or usage?

2016-11-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-11-28 13:39 GMT+01:00 Michael Tsang : > There are some highways which the quality isn't up to the usage, resulting > in > congestion. Those highways connects high-quality motorway/trunk/primary > highways together for long distance traffic, but they only have a single >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - flight route

2016-11-28 Thread Aun Johnsen
> On Nov 28, 2016, at 11:36, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > Hi all, > > As said, no need to draw paths as way in OSM : they can be drawed by any > customized render engine when start and stop point are known. > +1 to make relation with airports as only members. > > > 2016-11-28

Re: [Tagging] Key:visibility

2016-11-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 28 nov 2016, alle ore 12:40, Colin Smale ha > scritto: > > Do you mean visibility, or would legibility be better here? Maybe I can see a > clock from 100m away, but it is not actually useful until it becomes legible > at 20m. > > You

Re: [Tagging] highway=primary/secondary/tertiary - tag according to quality or usage?

2016-11-28 Thread Greg Troxel
Michael Tsang writes: > There are some highways which the quality isn't up to the usage, resulting in > congestion. Those highways connects high-quality motorway/trunk/primary > highways together for long distance traffic, but they only have a single lane > per direction,

Re: [Tagging] highway=primary/secondary/tertiary - tag according to quality or usage?

2016-11-28 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon Nov 28 12:39:44 2016 GMT, Michael Tsang wrote: > Dear all, > > There are some highways which the quality isn't up to the usage, resulting in > congestion. Those highways connects high-quality motorway/trunk/primary > highways together for long distance traffic, but they only have a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - flight route

2016-11-28 Thread François Lacombe
2016-11-28 13:39 GMT+01:00 Michael Tsang : > Sorry, aren't aeroplane routes, like bus routes, use fixed stop positions > and > platforms every departure? > > IMHO certainly not. Already took the same flight (same number) at two different gates nevertheless in the same terminal

[Tagging] highway=primary/secondary/tertiary - tag according to quality or usage?

2016-11-28 Thread Michael Tsang
Dear all, There are some highways which the quality isn't up to the usage, resulting in congestion. Those highways connects high-quality motorway/trunk/primary highways together for long distance traffic, but they only have a single lane per direction, with lots of traffic lights, junctions,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - flight route

2016-11-28 Thread Michael Tsang
On Monday 28 November 2016 12:47:41 Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > Platforms, a.k.a. Gates, can already be mapped. Which flight they serve > changes every day, this is neither mappable nor verifyable nor maintainable. Sorry, aren't aeroplane routes, like bus routes, use fixed stop positions and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - flight route

2016-11-28 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, As said, no need to draw paths as way in OSM : they can be drawed by any customized render engine when start and stop point are known. +1 to make relation with airports as only members. 2016-11-28 13:24 GMT+01:00 Aun Johnsen : > A duration tag would be needed to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - flight route

2016-11-28 Thread Aun Johnsen
> On Nov 28, 2016, at 10:00, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > On 28.11.2016 11:27, Michael Tsang wrote: >> The consensus is that the flight path should not be mapped, but we are >> interested the airport (Stop positions and platforms) where the flight >> serves. > > Platforms, a.k.a.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - flight route

2016-11-28 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 28.11.2016 11:27, Michael Tsang wrote: The consensus is that the flight path should not be mapped, but we are interested the airport (Stop positions and platforms) where the flight serves. Platforms, a.k.a. Gates, can already be mapped. Which flight they serve changes every day, this is

Re: [Tagging] Key:visibility

2016-11-28 Thread Colin Smale
Do you mean visibility, or would legibility be better here? Maybe I can see a clock from 100m away, but it is not actually useful until it becomes legible at 20m. You use the word "readable" (=legible) yourself. //colin On 2016-11-28 12:30, Paul Desgranges wrote: > Hello, > > Can we

[Tagging] Key:visibility

2016-11-28 Thread Paul Desgranges
Hello, Can we extend the Key:visibility so that it covers not only the clock, bit as well any device or feature which are readable on a public street ? For example, it could apply as well to 'advertising' objects (but it likely could apply

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - flight route

2016-11-28 Thread Michael Tsang
The consensus is that the flight path should not be mapped, but we are interested the airport (Stop positions and platforms) where the flight serves. Michael Get Outlook for Android From: Volker Schmidt Sent: Sunday, 27 November, 17:23 Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature