On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some of you may remember the discussion we had on tagging cardinal
> directions in the US, which led to the wiki page[1] describing the current
> practice.
> Basically the convention we arrived on is to tag relation members wi
Hi all,
Some of you may remember the discussion we had on tagging cardinal directions
in the US, which led to the wiki page[1] describing the current practice.
Basically the convention we arrived on is to tag relation members with
role=north/east/south/west to indicate cardinal direction.
This
On 13-Jan-17 06:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 13 Jan 2017, at 00:01, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have added some wikipedia links to the forestry table.
I am not a big fan of wikipedia links for definitions of tags, because wp pages
change, and have a dif
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:35:12PM +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 09/01/2017 11:53, SK53 wrote:
> > Somehow I have been oblivious to the fact that large numbers of polygons
> > tagged natural=heath have been added over the past few months to OSM.
>
> I think what's happening here is one mapper "
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2017-01-12 6:40 GMT+01:00 :
>
>> I certainly use route relations, and since ref is only really used for
>> the renderer, I don’t know what I was thinking ref:forward and ref:backward
>> would be useful for…
>
>
>
> Tagging considerat
sent from a phone
> On 13 Jan 2017, at 00:01, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have added some wikipedia links to the forestry table.
I am not a big fan of wikipedia links for definitions of tags, because wp pages
change, and have a different scope. Better copy those parts from the
