On 11-Jan-17 12:08 AM, Thilo wrote:
Hello all,
please check this proposal :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorcycle_friendly
Cheers,
Thilo
The proposal is for 'friendly:motorcycle=yes/no/complimentary'.
I have added to its discussion page the following;
1 top
> Gesendet: Samstag, 04. März 2017 um 21:21 Uhr
> Von: "Tobias Knerr"
> An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings
>
> And probably a few more. None of these requires relations.
I'm sure there is a lot of stuff in OSM where you could
On 04.03.2017 18:05, "Christian Müller" wrote:
Thanks for the examples and conclusion given. This is a strong reason to
demand its usage in wiki docs and IMO we should even suggest their usage
generally, regardless of the construction site's complexity.
Situations complex enough to require
> Gesendet: Samstag, 04. März 2017 um 10:17 Uhr
> Von: "Martin Koppenhoefer"
> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings
>
> So no, the building relations to group building:parts are
Please check where this mail has been gone, reason :
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-March/031403.html
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Feature Proposal - Voting - tag "motorcycle friendly" for
accomodations
Datum: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:46:19 +0100
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Feature Proposal - RFC - tag "motorcycle friendly" for
accomodations
Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:08:10 +0100
Von:Thilo
An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hello all,
please check this proposal :
Hi,
Am 2017-03-04 um 15:02 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> mapping this kind of information (e.g. michelin star restaurants ) in a
> structured and systematic way is likely forbidden because it means recreating
> a (probably) proprietary db
IMHO this is the only way who the friendliness of a
sent from a phone
> On 4 Mar 2017, at 13:50, Yves wrote:
>
> With signage I meant a particular signage, such as 'Recommended by the xyz
> motorcycle club', recognized in some way and defined outside of OSM.
> This kind of sign is rather frequent, and mapping them moves
sent from a phone
> On 4 Mar 2017, at 07:24, Yves wrote:
>
> If there is a signage, then we should map the signage.
I don't agree that mapping the signage would be particularly helpful, besides
there's no tag for this kind of signs, these sign objects wouldn't be
sent from a phone
> On 3 Mar 2017, at 23:04, Christian Müller wrote:
>
> It may be redundant, but it's far from useless.
it may seem redundant, and if you assume construction sites to be unique for a
certain piece of land you would be right, but there are exceptions. There
10 matches
Mail list logo