Re: [Tagging] Railway: Preserved or historic or railway:preserved?

Any active passenger railway is, among other usages, for tourism. So usage=tourism seems to be redundant. On 12 Apr 2017 00:15, "Wolfgang Zenker" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not a railway expert, but like to comment anyway. > > * Dave F [170411

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - historic=tombstone

On 10 April 2017 23:27:36 CEST, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >2017-04-10 22:55 GMT+02:00 Michal Fabík : > >> Definition: use this tag for prominent tombstones > > > >I would not put "prominent" in the definition, otherwise the question >will >be:

Re: [Tagging] Railway: Preserved or historic or railway:preserved?

Hi, I'm not a railway expert, but like to comment anyway. * Dave F [170411 23:41]: > I've a length of railway track that runs along part of a disused line. > It's not connected to the current network & run purely for tourism. Well, the track IS operated, so the

[Tagging] Railway: Preserved or historic or railway:preserved?

Hi I'm confused. I've a length of railway track that runs along part of a disused line. It's not connected to the current network & run purely for tourism. Both KeepRight & Osmose flag an error for 'railway=preserved' tags: "This way uses deprecated tag 'railway=preserved'. Please use

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant that doesn't sell alcohol...

2017-04-11 16:39 GMT+02:00 Michal Fabík : > But then some information will always be lost. If a restaurant is tagged > with alcohol=bring_your_own, can I still order a beer there? If it's tagged > with alcohol=yes, can I bring my own wine? Does alcohol=no mean "no alcohol

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant that doesn't sell alcohol...

But then some information will always be lost. If a restaurant is tagged with alcohol=bring_your_own, can I still order a beer there? If it's tagged with alcohol=yes, can I bring my own wine? Does alcohol=no mean "no alcohol sold" or "no alcohol tolerated"? Regards, -- Michal Fabík On Tue, Apr

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant that doesn't sell alcohol...

Indeed. It's an Indian establishment & I'm pretty sure it's based on religious grounds. I think this tag needs to be a generic indicator of their services rather than a subset of cuisine, so alcohol=yes/no/bring_your_own covers it. DaveF On 11/04/2017 12:46, Philip Barnes wrote: On Tue,

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant that doesn't sell alcohol...

> On Apr 11, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Philip Barnes wrote: > > here is a term 'corkage' which is where a 'posh' restaurant allows you > to take your own drinks, Bottle service. They chill and serve your own wine to you. I think that should be another value of:

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant that doesn't sell alcohol...

On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 20:00 +0900, John Willis wrote: > > On Apr 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, althio wrote: > > > > My ideas are about: > > alcohol=yes/no/bring_your_own > > wine=yes/no/bring_your_own > > +1  >   > Perhaps alcohol:wine=*   ?  That is getting a little into

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant that doesn't sell alcohol...

> On Apr 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, althio wrote: > > My ideas are about: > alcohol=yes/no/bring_your_own > wine=yes/no/bring_your_own +1 Perhaps alcohol:wine=* ? Javbw. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant that doesn't sell alcohol...

I looked to see if 'byob' had been used but abbreviations just lead to confusion. althio's suggestion below seems appropriate. Unless another more appropriate tag is suggested I'll use that & add it to the wiki. DaveF. On 10/04/2017 23:26, althio wrote: I agree with Martin and I must insist: