Re: [Tagging] Truck Parking

[Warin]

On 03-Jun-17 12:14 PM, Bill Ricker wrote:


On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com 
> wrote:


At present I have;

hgv=yes/designated and

capacity:hgv=yes/number


​Are you asking for proposing updates to wiki, or for what ​to use on 
your mapping project ?


Sorry.
What to use tagging wise on areas presently tagged amenity=parking, 
name=Truck Parking.
I think the name tag should be deleted. But I don't want to loose the 
information .. so I think both of the above tags might be added to cover 
any future migration issues.





​taginfo reports actual usage -

  * hgv=*  has
myriad parking combinations
 (use
uper right filter *parking*)
  * hgv=yes combines with ​either service
=parking_aisle
 or
amenity =parking

  * hgv=designated combines with any amenity
=parking

parking:lane:both
=*
parking =* parking
=surface

  * ​capacity:hgv
=* combines

with ​ parking , parking_space , parking:condition ,
parking:condition:maxstay , parking:condition:default ,
parking:condition:time_interval, but not *amenity*=parking.
  * amenity=parking

has hgv=no, designated, yes. But capacity:hgv not listed.




___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Truck Parking

[Bill Ricker]

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> At present I have;
>
> hgv=yes/designated and
>
> capacity:hgv=yes/number
>

​Are you asking for proposing updates to wiki, or for what ​to use on your
mapping project ?

​taginfo reports actual usage -

   - hgv=*  has myriad
   parking combinations
    (use uper
   right filter *parking*)
   - hgv=yes combines with ​either service
   =parking_aisle
    or amenity
   =parking
   
   - hgv=designated combines with any amenity
   =parking
   
   parking:lane:both
   =*  parking
   =*  parking
   =surface
   
   - ​capacity:hgv =*
   combines
   
   with ​ parking , parking_space , parking:condition ,
   parking:condition:maxstay , parking:condition:default ,
   parking:condition:time_interval, but not *amenity*=parking.
   - amenity=parking
   
   has hgv=no, designated, yes. But capacity:hgv not listed.



-- 
Bill Ricker
bill.n1...@gmail.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Truck Parking

[Warin]

Hi,

Presently some mappers are using the name key to indicate truck parking. 
Yes, this is against the 'rules'.


But .. what is the best way if indicating that the parking are is 
suitable for parking trucks?



At present I have;

hgv=yes/designated and

capacity:hgv=yes/number


Are there any others?

I am tempted to use both of the above tags - covers any future 
preference. Thoughts?




___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging attractions that are farms

[John Willis]

> On Jun 2, 2017, at 7:01 PM, Marc Gemis  wrote:
> 
> I would map it as tourism=attraction [1]  and not as
> tourism=theme_park

I totally agree that it is not a tourism=theme park. 

But there places with multiple interesting  things - attractions in the tourism 
sense, not the rollercoaster sense. 

Just yesterday they announced they are making a "Ghibli theme park" in Japan 
(their famous animation studio)- which means a collection of spectacles - not 
rides (they don't do rides). This will be a *huge* attraction in Japan (on the 
level of a famous theme park) - each item inside is a tourism=attraction - so 
how do you tag a collection of tourism=attraction s? 

http://kotaku.com/theyre-making-a-studio-ghibli-theme-park-in-japan-1795712103

Tourism=* doesn't seem to have a way to define a non-ride "theme park" - a 
collection of tourism=attractions and other tourist amenities in one named 
place. I think we should consider having such a tag. 

Javbw___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging attractions that are farms

[Marc Gemis]

I would map it as tourism=attraction [1]  and not as
tourism=theme_park [2]  (as would be the case for Disneyland)
Roller coasters, animals, gardens, etc can be mapped as attraction=*
[3] within the tourism=attraction/theme_park area

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtheme_park
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:attraction

regards

m

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:30 AM, John Willis  wrote:
>
> The more I work on tagging this one singular named place, the more I realize 
> I wish there was something like
>
> tourism=attraction_centre, because there are several “points of interest” 
> that are operated inside this place, and even an actual “attraction” (a raft 
> ride to see the clear water).
>
> How do people deal with a place that is a collection of attractions that 
> isn’t a park or a disneyland theme park with rides?
>
> Javbw
>
>
>
>> On Jun 2, 2017, at 9:08 AM, John Willis  wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to tag a regional attraction, and I am unsure how to tag the 
>> attraction by itself.
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging attractions that are farms

[Topographe Fou]

Hi John,
Based on what you said I would tag this area as a farmyard (because it produces 
things) inside a probably bigger (because of parking, buildings...) regular 
theme park which contains everything else (visitor center, toilets, parking, 
shop...).

LeTopographeFou


  Message original  
De: jo...@mac.com
Envoyé: 2 juin 2017 10:48 AM
À: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Répondre à: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Objet: Re: [Tagging] Tagging attractions that are farms


The more I work on tagging this one singular named place, the more I realize I 
wish there was something like

tourism=attraction_centre, because there are several “points of interest” that 
are operated inside this place, and even an actual “attraction” (a raft ride to 
see the clear water).

How do people deal with a place that is a collection of attractions that isn’t 
a park or a disneyland theme park with rides?

Javbw


> On Jun 2, 2017, at 9:08 AM, John Willis  wrote:
> 
> I am trying to tag a regional attraction, and I am unsure how to tag the 
> attraction by itself.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging attractions that are farms

[John Willis]

The more I work on tagging this one singular named place, the more I realize I 
wish there was something like

tourism=attraction_centre, because there are several “points of interest” that 
are operated inside this place, and even an actual “attraction” (a raft ride to 
see the clear water). 

How do people deal with a place that is a collection of attractions that isn’t 
a park or a disneyland theme park with rides?

Javbw



> On Jun 2, 2017, at 9:08 AM, John Willis  wrote:
> 
> I am trying to tag a regional attraction, and I am unsure how to tag the 
> attraction by itself. 

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging