Last Saturday, I took some pictures of the towers/pylons near my home. I
uploaded 11 images to a flickr album here.
You can easily get an idea of what I am talking about (separated or “abandoned”
landuses), and the massive scale of some of the tower/pylons.
there are refs and descriptions for a
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:26 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> the landuse, if they cross farmland the land beneath them is still farmland
> or in the case of this photo natural=wood.
Yes, I agree there instances where the pylons sit on a landuse, and it doesn’t
substantially change the sur
On 2017-07-04 14:49, Mark Bradley wrote:
In American English most people would call the structure a tower, but
according to the convention of OSM using British English, I would
defer to the word "pylon."
In British English, yes the general public usually call them 'pylons'.
But this is not used
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:49:07 -0400
"Mark Bradley" wrote:
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 12:14:11 +0100
> > From: Philip Barnes
> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Power Tower Landuse = ?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4 July 2017 11:07:04 BST
2017-07-04 18:15 GMT+02:00 marc marc :
> Le 04. 07. 17 à 17:14, François Lacombe a écrit :
> > I still have some comments :
> > * fire_hydrant:couplings:type may only be fire_hydrant:couplings without
> > the :type suffix
> > * fire_hydrant:type really should be fire_hydrant only. I don't get the
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2017, at 13:14, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> Although I am a little confused by the purpose of this thread, the presence
> of pylons does not in my experience change the landuse, if they cross
> farmland the land beneath them is still farmland or in the case of this
Le 04. 07. 17 à 17:14, François Lacombe a écrit :
> I still have some comments :
> * fire_hydrant:couplings:type may only be fire_hydrant:couplings without
> the :type suffix
> * fire_hydrant:type really should be fire_hydrant only. I don't get the
> benefit of adding :type here (feel free to giv
Hi Viking,
Thank you for proposal updating
I still have some comments :
* fire_hydrant:couplings:type may only be fire_hydrant:couplings without
the :type suffix
* fire_hydrant:type really should be fire_hydrant only. I don't get the
benefit of adding :type here (feel free to give me hints)
* Can
2017-07-04 15:39 GMT+02:00 Mark Bradley :
>
> I nominate Martin, John Willis, and a few others on this list to form a
> committee and formulate an organized tagging structure for OSM. You guys
> are intelligent and thoughtful and I would trust you to come up with a good
> solution. I'm tired of
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 12:14:11 +0100
> From: Philip Barnes
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Power Tower Landuse = ?
>
>
>
> On 4 July 2017 11:07:04 BST, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
> >2017-07-04 1:56 GMT+02:00 John Willis :
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 18:30:31 +0800
> From: Jherome Miguel
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Power Tower Landuse = ?
>
>
> Though I came lately here, I agree. Indicating the type of industrial area
> will help
> indicate the indu
On 4 July 2017 11:07:04 BST, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>2017-07-04 1:56 GMT+02:00 John Willis :
>
>> it seems like other long-term infrastructure (power towers,
>communication
>> towers) are suggested to be landuse=industrial.
>>
>> I really think there should be some kind of subtag then, becau
Though I came lately here, I agree. Indicating the type of industrial area
will help indicate the industry where the piece of land is used.
--TagaSanPedroAko
On Jul 4, 2017 6:08 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer"
wrote:
>
> 2017-07-04 1:56 GMT+02:00 John Willis :
>
>> it seems like other long-term infra
2017-07-04 1:56 GMT+02:00 John Willis :
> it seems like other long-term infrastructure (power towers, communication
> towers) are suggested to be landuse=industrial.
>
> I really think there should be some kind of subtag then, because not only
> can you define what and why you are tagging, but it
2017-07-04 2:38 GMT+02:00 John Willis :
> This particular question (how to add cycle rental to a tourist information
> office) is a symptom of a larger tagging issue in OSM - you can’t add
> multiple amenities/services that are not mappable features to most mappable
> places.
because an amenity
15 matches
Mail list logo
