Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

sent from a phone > On 18. Aug 2017, at 21:06, Javier Sánchez Portero > wrote: > > I accept this, although is not clearly expressed in > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels > Does everyone agree that building:levels refers to the maximum number of > building levels? As

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

Le 18. 08. 17 à 21:06, Javier Sánchez Portero a écrit : > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels > Does everyone agree that building:levels refers to the maximum number of > building levels? This is common sense, irl when you talk about the number of levels of a building, it is t

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants vs suction_point

On 8/18/17 4:33 PM, Moritz wrote: > > Hi Richard >> in actual real world usage, however, they are called dry hydrants by >> their >> users (the fire departments). they are even signed as "dry hydrants" in >> many >> cases. there's such a sign not far from me, i can go take a picture of >> it. > I t

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants vs suction_point

Hi Richard >in actual real world usage, however, they are called dry hydrants by >their >users (the fire departments). they are even signed as "dry hydrants" in >many >cases. there's such a sign not far from me, i can go take a picture of >it. I think it's a language issue here. Here in Germany

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

Hello Tobias and Cristian 2017-08-18 17:41 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr : > On 18.08.2017 10:01, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > If e.g. the lower floors of the apartment building is wider than the > > upper floors, you can tag the outline with both, building=apartments and > > building:part=yes and the appropr

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

> Sent: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:47:04 +0100 > From: "Javier Sánchez Portero" > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas > > Thank you. This clarifies me a lot because I had not thought to use both > building=* and building:part=* in the f

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

On 18.08.2017 10:01, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > If e.g. the lower floors of the apartment building is wider than the > upper floors, you can tag the outline with both, building=apartments and > building:part=yes and the appropriate 3D-properties, and the narrower > upper floors with building:part=yes and

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants vs suction_point

2017-08-18 15:13 GMT+02:00 marc marc : > another part with > depreciating fire_hydrant:type=pond <> pressure=0 <> emergency=water_source > +1 With 733 664 emergency=fire_hydrant and 4 370 suction_point, this particular point has chances to make the whole proposal rejected despite some points hav

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants vs suction_point

Le 17. 08. 17 à 16:47, Viking a écrit : > I'm waiting for other opinions. colour:bonnet colour:cap colour:reflective seems for me to be in the reverse order the colour of a building is building:colour not colour:building the same exist with roof:colour light:colour ... survey:date is the date of

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

First tag the whole building without any "part". Therefore, building:levels, height refers to the maximum level and maximum height of the building, not an average. If a single closed way is enough to draw a building, you don't need multipolygon at this time. For nearly all applications that don't

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

With building:part you are actually describing 3D volumes. These volumes don't necessarily start at ground level, but ideally should not intersect in 3D. As you can see in the Simple 3D building specification, you can set a "building:min_level" and "min_height" to "raise" a certain part from gr

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

I propose this tag to describe middle age buildings created before the "romanesque revolution" of the 11th century. I guess english people would like something like "celtic", but I am using "preromanesque" instead of "celtic" because in Spain there is no "celtic" middle age architecture. In my cou

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

2017-08-18 9:01 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer : > On 18.08.2017 02:30, Clifford Snow wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Javier Sánchez Portero < >> javiers...@gmail.com > wrote: >> * In the wiki [1] says that the outline should be tagged with >> building:levels a

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

Sorry, I should have taken time to give some examples. Please read below (I rev. 2017-08-18 1:30 GMT+01:00 Clifford Snow : > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Javier Sánchez Portero < > javiers...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I am thinking in ways to reduce the complexity that introduces the >> m

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

On 18.08.2017 02:30, Clifford Snow wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Javier Sánchez Portero > wrote: * In the wiki [1] says that the outline should be tagged with building:levels and height, but this, if the parts cover the whole outline, is a duplicati