Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

2017-08-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 23. Aug 2017, at 00:55, marc marc wrote: > > IMHO it is only one building that rest on the ground > including what you consider as separate buildings. here's an example, it's from 2001 in the port of Rotterdam and called parasite: https://marialuisatavano94.files.wordp

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Transformers extension

2017-08-22 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, Thanks to several interesting feedbacks regarding this proposal, I've completed the tagging a bit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Transformer_extension_proposal - Adding windings:configuration to describe different connections between windings inside a transformer.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 18. Aug 2017, at 11:22, José G Moya Y. wrote: > > I propose this tag to describe middle age buildings created before the > "romanesque revolution" of the 11th century. I guess english people would > like something like "celtic", but I am using "preromanesque" instead o

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

2017-08-22 Thread marc marc
Le 23. 08. 17 à 00:25, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > On 19. Aug 2017, at 10:16, marc marc wrote: >>> and minus the building:min_level. >> no. min_level is a 3D feature. >> the level of a building as a whole doesn't take care of min_level. >> A building as a whole can not begin at level 2. >> A b

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

2017-08-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 19. Aug 2017, at 17:59, Javier Sánchez Portero > wrote: > > Would any one support a proposal for a new tag building:part:levels=* to > separate the levels of the building from the part as in this case: > > way1 {building=residential, building:part=yes, building:levels

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

2017-08-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone On 19. Aug 2017, at 10:16, marc marc wrote: >> and minus the building:min_level. > no. min_level is a 3D feature. > the level of a building as a whole doesn't take care of min_level. > A building as a whole can not begin at level 2. > A building as a whole must rest on the gr

Re: [Tagging] service=access

2017-08-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 6. Aug 2017, at 06:49, Gerd Petermann > wrote: > > my understanding is that most hw=service are used to access a specific > man_made object, so this tag > seems to be superfluous to me. I would simply not use the service tag here. I agree, although I can imagine mapp